Some of my favorite Gapster and other forum member posts over the years...
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
NYTimes Religion in America and Atlantic Monthly Forum Quotes - Please turn on soul!
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
-------------------------------------------------
.
.
.
.
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
The fundamentalist evangelical creed: Compassion without conversion is meaningless. - (greenhillsrh @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Fundamentalism is synonymous with false witness. - (Innocent @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
To think that only certain long-dead humans had a lock on the truth and that we should simply take their word on everything is both idolatry, because it elevates biblical redactors to the level of infallible divinities, and blasphemy, because it denigrates one of the finest aspects of creation: the human mind. - (jeniferlewis @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Spirituality, like all forms of love, is subjective. - (caintrask @NYTimes Religion in America forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
The Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
The Silver Rule: do unto others as they do unto you. - (wolfgang2a @NYTimes Religion in America forum.)
The Bronze Rule: do unto others before they do it to you. - (leszekcnn @NYTimes Religion in America)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
That's the unavoidable hazard of being a conservative -- you always lose to change eventually, because change is inevitable. (leszekcnn @NYTimes Religion in America)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
I will not stand for the falsehoods of the J4J. They are NOT Jews; They are Baptists. And, insofar as they bear false witness, they are NEITHER Jews NOR "for Jesus." - (ysolde1968 @NYTimes Religion in America)
Wolfgang's insistence that God is an old white man with a penis and testicles is not surprising. After all, when the god is male, the male is god. - (ysolde1968 @NYTimes Religion in America)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
One dealt with Chiron, the centaur tutor of Heracles (Hercules). One day, so the story goes, Herk asked Chiron what was the greatest blessing of all. Instead of answering, the centaur ran away. Heracles pursued, and overtook Chiron, since the was the only man alive that could run faster than a horse.
He got Chiron down and put his knee of his throat and demanded an answer. Chiron replied, "The greatest blessing is never to have been born."
Herk reflected that it was too late for that, so he asked for the second greatest blessing. Chiron said, "To die soon." - (John Green @The Atlantic Online Religion and Spirituality forums)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
That's "xenophobic"... I think that "zenophobia" is the fear of the idea of continuous motion in infinitely divisible space and time, or something. - (Poster @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
Zeno of Elea
http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/z/zenoelea.htm _.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
When "love of god" exceeds love of humanity, horrible things happen. - (leszekcnn, @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Did Jesus say, "After he strikes you on the second cheek, go ahead and rip him a new one"? No. - (sbbarnwell, @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Losing a Church, Keeping the Faith By ANDREW SULLIVAN
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/opinion/19SULL.html _.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
An analogy between the Pope's view of homosexuality and those of Rev. "God hats fags" Phelps:
These sorts of discussions always remind me of the difference between a kosher and a non-kosher slaughterer.
For the kosher butcher, the slaughtering is a ritual - there are blessings, rituals of sanctity, and the final execution itself - a knife drawn gently but firmly across the cow's throat.
For the gentile butcher, the slaughtering is non-sanctified and swift - a heavy hammer or bolt to the animal's head. No prayers, no sanctity - just the slaughter.
Of course, none of this makes the remotest difference to the cow. - (striver gordon, The Atlantic Religion and Spirituality forums)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Dr. Seuss New Testament:
I am Jesus.
Jesus I am.
Now you may eat
Lobster and ham.
- (brelinck @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
Dr. Seuss Leviticus:
Thou shalt not do it with a goat.
Thou shalt not do it in a boat.
Thou shalt not do it with thine @ss,
Much less thy neighbor's, saucy lass!
Thou shalt not do it with an elf.
Thou shalt not do it by thyself.
Thou shalt not do it in a flood.
Thou shalt not do it if there's blood.
Thou shalt not do it if thee match.
(Don't thou know what thou couldst catch?)
Thou shalt not do it with thy mother.
But thou can with brother's brother.
Thou shalt not do it with thy dad
Unless he's sloppy drunk or mad.
Thou shalt not do it here or there.
Thou shalt not do it anywhere!
- (brelinck @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
DR. SEUSS: Why did the chicken cross the road:
Did the chicken cross the road?
Did he cross it with a toad?
Yes, the chicken crossed the road,
but why it crossed I've not been told.
- (brelinck @NYTimes Religion in America Forum)
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
"Who"
Catholic Protestant
Muslim and Jews
Look at each other
with frightening views
What are we doing
this isn't God's plan
We are meant to be brothers
this family of man
There seems to be something
that gets in the way
Confusing ours minds
from what his words say
Love each other
the gist of his book
No matter the language
or how it may look
I've missed something
I don't understand
WHO is it then
if it isn't Gods hand
Who darkens dreams
with hatred and fear
Clouding our vision
till nothing is clear
Sharpens our rage
with a point of a knife
Who sends the misguided
to cause loss of life
Who wants the world
to tremble and shake
Who takes innocent
lives in his wake
Who breaks the spirit
then fills it with hate
Demonic decisions
sealing their fate
Who takes a man
and warps his soul
Death and destruction
his devious goal
Who turns souls black
with power or greed
Who preaches hate
planting the seed
For the slaughter of others
but who do we blame
The ultimate evil
it's done in Gods name©
Author ~M@C~ copyright © Ed Schmidt 2002-2003, @Atlantic Monthly Religion and Spirituality forums.
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._
From the Institute for Stork Research and Science
Two different theories exist concerning the origin of children: the theory of Sexual reproduction, and the theory of the stork. Many people believe in the theory of sexual reproduction because they have been taught this theory at school. In reality, however, many of the world's leading scientists are in favor of the theory of the stork. If the theory of sexual reproduction is taught in schools, it must only be taught as a theory and not as the truth. Alternative theories, such as the theory of the stork, must also be taught.
Evidence supporting the theory of the stork includes the following:
1. It is a scientifically established fact that the stork does exist. This can be confirmed by every ornithologist.
2. The alleged human fetal development contains several features that the theory of sexual reproduction is unable to explain.
3. The theory of sexual reproduction implies that a child is approximately nine months old at birth. This is an absurd claim. Everyone knows that a newborn child is newborn.
4. According to the theory of sexual reproduction, children are a result of sexual intercourse. There are, however, several well documented cases where sexual intercourse has not led to the birth of a child.
5. Statistical studies in the Netherlands have indicated a positive correlation between the birth rate and the number of storks. Both are decreasing.
6. The theory of the stork can be investigated by rigorous scientific methods. The only assumption involved is that children are delivered by the stork. – Unknown – a (remarkably accurate) parody of “Creationism.”
_.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:._