Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Ethics/Values in politics
C-Span sucks community > politics > Political Soapbox
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190
davisął
QUOTE(Nomarchy @ Nov 29 2005, 08:43 PM)
What do you classify as "peer pressure"? Contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism is a character-flow about as serious as 'giving in for the sake of giving in".
[right][snapback]157646[/snapback][/right]



Allow me to clarify. If I think something is just wrong or if it's something I despise (such as whiskey) I will not be pressured into doing it. Besides that, my friend really didn't want the shot of whiskey but gave in. That's stupid. Whiskey on top of a Thanksgiving dinner? No thanks. laugh.gif laugh.gif

As far as the war goes, do you think I liked being alone in my view that the invasion and occupation was wrong? That was not a character flaw. A few friends agreed with my concerns but many quoted the WMD lines from the administration. They ate up the 10 - 15 minutes of propaganda they were fed once or twice a day on the news without checking other sources. Not me, but I have the convienience of working at home a lot. I watched a very enlightening Phil Donahue show just before the war. He had pros and cons. Scott Ritter, Greg Theilman and others. I listened to the evidence I was presented and added the track record of those involved and came up with my own conclusion. That was one of the only balanced shows I saw. You know what the administration did to dissenters.

But you are correct. It is a character flaw I must keep in check. I'm a bullheaded SOB. But my concience is clear.

huh.gif tongue.gif


Must be from my mom. She is a bullhead that way.

I like to think I can be convinced by logic.
davisął
I use the war as an example. I may appear to be automatically contrary but it was only after a lot of thought and consideration.
SpaceCowboy
No need to make a stink about a team prayer though. Bow your head as a courtesy to the folks who are praying and just be quiet.

Unless you want to make a point, of course.
Arturo_Vandelay
Just visualize kicking a touchdown.
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Nov 29 2005, 10:25 PM)
Just visualize kicking a touchdown.
[right][snapback]157713[/snapback][/right]

That or Whirled Peas.
Arturo_Vandelay
Or armed bears.
Bart Katz
Arghhhhhhh rolleyes.gif rolleyes.gif
roserose
QUOTE(SpaceCowboy @ Nov 29 2005, 10:28 PM)
That or Whirled Peas.
[right][snapback]157714[/snapback][/right]

Need a rag?
Friend Judy
QUOTE(SpaceCowboy @ Nov 29 2005, 10:13 PM)
No need to make a stink about a team prayer though. Bow your head as a courtesy to the folks who are praying and just be quiet.

Unless you want to make a point, of course.
[right][snapback]157712[/snapback][/right]


It didn't stop at a short team prayer, but extended to inspirational Bible verse of the day, long lectures about strength through Jesus, and "Praise Jesus" as the chosen way of celebrating touchdowns. Fortunately, the coach finally got asked to resign after complaints about trying to convert the Mormon kids to being Baptists.
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE(Friend Judy @ Nov 29 2005, 11:54 PM)
It didn't stop at a short team prayer, but extended to inspirational Bible verse of the day, long lectures about strength through Jesus, and "Praise Jesus" as the chosen way of celebrating touchdowns.  Fortunately, the coach finally got asked to resign after complaints about trying to convert the Mormon kids to being Baptists.
[right][snapback]157745[/snapback][/right]

Praise Jesus!

And don't fuck with the Mormons.
roserose
How can I possibly mess with Mormans for all they've done for me.
user posted image
Bart Katz
QUOTE(roserose @ Nov 30 2005, 12:12 AM)
How can I possibly mess with Mormans for all they've done for me.
user posted image
[right][snapback]157751[/snapback][/right]


Can I marry all of them?
Friend Judy
QUOTE(roserose @ Nov 30 2005, 12:12 AM)
How can I possibly mess with Mormans for all they've done for me.
user posted image
[right][snapback]157751[/snapback][/right]


Hmmm. It would appear they've forgotten their sacred undergarments!
Friend Judy
QUOTE
WASHINGTON - New evidence is emerging that the top Democrat on the Senate committee currently investigating Jack Abramoff got political money arranged by the lobbyist back in 2002 shortly after the lawmaker took action favorable to Abramoff's tribal clients.

A lawyer for the Louisiana Coushatta Indians told The Associated Press that Abramoff instructed the tribe to send $5,000 to Sen. Byron Dorgan (news, bio, voting record)'s political group just three weeks after the North Dakota Democrat urged fellow senators to fund a tribal school program Abramoff's clients wanted to use.

The check was one of about five dozen the Coushattas listed in a tribal ledger as being issued on March 6, 2002, to various lawmakers' campaigns and political causes at the instruction of Abramoff, tribal attorney Jimmy Faircloth said Monday.

Many of the recipients were lawmakers who had just written letters to the Bush administration or Congress supportive of Abramoff's tribal causes, documents show.

"I am confident of that fact," Faircloth said when asked whether Abramoff had requested the donations listed in a tribal ledger obtained by the AP.

The revelation came as Dorgan took to the offensive Monday, saying there was no connection between the $20,000 in donations he got from Abramoff's firm and tribal clients in spring 2002 and a February 2002 letter he wrote urging the Senate Appropriations Committee to fund the tribal school building program.

Dorgan's letter noted that the Mississippi Choctaw, one of Abramoff's clients, had successfully used the program and requested lawmakers consider long-term funding for it. It made no mention of Abramoff or any of his other tribes that were interested in the program.

Dorgan sharply criticized an AP story last week that divulged he and about a dozen other lawmakers had gotten Abramoff-related donations around the time they sent letters supporting the school building program.

Dorgan told a news conference in North Dakota he had never met Abramoff, did not know about the donations from the lobbyist's clients around the time of his letter and saw no reason to step aside from the Senate Indian Affairs committee investigation of Abramoff.

"I don't have any idea what was contributed to me, or by whom. No contribution has been made to me that was ever represented as a contribution coming from Mr. Abramoff, or any relationship to things that he was involved in," Dorgan said when quizzed about the $20,000 in donations.

Dorgan said he wrote the letter because he supported the tribal school construction program and believed tribes in his state might benefit. "The Bush administration wanted to shut the program down. I disagreed. The program saves the federal government money and gets results. That makes sense to me," he said.

Dorgan's staff said Dorgan believes the letter was drafted by Sen. Conrad Burns (news, bio, voting record), R-Mont., who also signed it and got similar donations from Abramoff's clients in the same time frame.

For instance, the Coushattas' check ledger shows the tribe on March 6, 2002, wrote checks for $5,000 to Dorgan's political group, called the Great Plains Leadership Fund, and $25,000 to Burns. That money ultimately landed in Burns' Friends of the Big Sky political group, records show.

Other checks listed as being issued that day were made out to groups or campaigns associated with Sens. Trent Lott, Mary Landrieu, Harry Reid and John Breaux and Reps.    Tom DeLay, Charles Taylor and Pete Session, all of whom wrote letters favorable to Abramoff tribal client causes, the ledger shows.

Those lawmakers, like Dorgan, have denied any connection between the letters and the donations.

"The suggestion in the story that I may have supported that school construction program because of Jack Abramoff or because of campaign contributions from Indian tribes is clearly and despicably wrong," Dorgan said.

Dorgan's spokesman, Barry E. Piatt, said he believed his boss had pursued the congressional investigation of Abramoff aggressively.

Asked why that investigation hasn't focused more on donations to lawmakers who wrote letters favorable to Abramoff's clients, Piatt said, "They're investigating what appears to be massive fraud, and there's lots of ground to cover and it is still early."

Dorgan's office also corrected one piece of information it provided last week. In an interview last Wednesday, Dorgan chief of staff Bernie Toon told the AP that congressional aide Peter Kiefhaber worked for Dorgan's subcommittee in late January 2003.

Kiefhaber did work for the Democratic staff of the Senate Interior Appropriations subcommittee at the time and Dorgan was a member, but Dorgan didn't formally take over as the top Democrat on the panel until March 4, 2003, his office said Monday.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051129/ap_on_...HNlYwMlJVRPUCUl


Y'know, one question seems to be going PCly unasked about all this mess: What about the Indians role in all this? I find it hard to believe they're the helpless innocent victims they're being portrayed as.
Friend Judy
QUOTE
Brazen Conspiracy


Tuesday, November 29, 2005; Page A20

YESTERDAY'S guilty plea by Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham -- make that former representative, since he resigned after entering the plea -- reveals the most brazen bribery conspiracy in modern congressional history. A San Diego Republican and Vietnam War veteran who served on the House Appropriations defense subcommittee and the intelligence committee, Mr. Cunningham admitted taking $2.4 million in bribes from two defense contractors angling for government contracts and from two other co-conspirators.

The bribes are breathtaking in their scope, audacity and sheer greed: Payments for Mr. Cunningham's yacht and his Rolls Royce. Silver candelabras. A leather sofa. Two Laser Shot shooting simulators for $9,200. A graduation party for the congressman's daughter (for only $2,000).

Mr. Cunningham not only sold his Del Mar, Calif., home to a defense contractor at an inflated price of $1.5 million; he then jacked up the price an additional $175,000, hid the defense contractor's participation by removing his name from the sales agreement, took a $115,100 check to cover the capital gains taxes and had the defense contractor pick up $11,000 in moving fees. Then the two defense contractors paid more than $1 million toward the mortgage on Mr. Cunningham's new home.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...5112801678.html

The thing that always puzzles me about this sort of grand scale corruption is that in the midst of the zillion-dollar bribes, you always find a bunch of such utter petty shit. Bernie Ebbers loots his company of gazillions, and in the middle of long list you find a $100 bill for flowers for someone's birthday. Abramoff comps a $250 lunch for DeLay. Ken Lay has Enron pay his maid.

I just don't get that mentality. Why, in midst of the wholesale plundering of millions, does somene fart around with, quite literally, a free lunch?
davisął



Fewer auditors, Pentagon secrecy hinder oversight

By David Wood



WASHINGTON — Could a defense company stuff a Pentagon contract with enough overhead to hide bribes to a congressman?

Easy enough, say veteran Washington insiders. The Pentagon has tens of thousands of contracts to monitor and a shrinking force of auditors, making oversight difficult. What's more, the super-secret part of the defense budget — the classified, or "black" budget — hides some $28 billion in spending. Government auditors and even senators have to get special clearance to see the details.

That is how Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham gained at least $2.4 million in favors from companies that held contracts with the Defense Department. The companies were not identified by name in the plea agreement reached with the California Republican and filed Monday in U.S. District Court in San Diego.

It was clear from facts in the criminal charges, however, that Mitchell J. Wade, president of Washington-based MZM Inc., is "Co-conspirator No. 2." On Tuesday, Michael Lipman, a lawyer for Brent Wilkes, head of San Diego area defense contractor ADCS Inc., said Wilkes is "Co-conspirator No. 1" in the charging documents.

Cunningham, decorated for service as a Navy pilot during the Vietnam War, sat on the defense subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, where he shaped billions of dollars in defense spending. He resigned his seat Monday.

It wasn't defense auditors who caught Cunningham; it was investigators looking into his ownership of a luxury home, a yacht and other perks.

Wade's relationship with Cunningham became the early focus of the investigation when San Diego area newspapers reported in June that he had bought the congressman's Del Mar, Calif., home at an inflated price and allowed him to live rent-free on his 42-foot yacht, the Duke-Stir, while in Washington.
Rep. Cunningham's money trail


Some of the payments accepted by Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham as detailed in his plea agreement:

$200,000 toward the purchase of his Arlington, Va., condominium.

$140,000 to a third party for the "Duke-Stir" yacht, which was moved to his boat slip for his use.

$16,867.13 to a marine services company for repairs to his own yacht, the "Kelly C."

$12,000 paid to an antique store for three night stands, a leaded glass cabinet, a washstand, a buffet and four armoires.

$6,632 paid to a furniture store for a leather sofa and a sleigh-style bed.

$7,200 paid to an antique store for a circa 1850 Louis Phillipe period commode and a circa 1830 Restoration period commode.

$13,500 toward the purchase of a Rolls-Royce.

$17,890 for repairs to the Rolls-Royce.

$11,394 paid to a moving company to ship his belongings from his Arlington condominium to his San Diego-area home.

$2,081 paid to a Washington, D.C., hotel for his daughter's graduation party.

$9,200 paid to a manufacturer for two Laser Shot shooting simulators.

$10,000 paid to various hotels, resorts and restaurants for his meals and entertainment expenses.

Hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash to him and a company he controlled.

Source: Plea agreement filed in U.S. District Court

The Associated Press

The first payments to Cunningham listed in the plea agreement were checks totaling $100,000 from Wilkes that were issued around May 1, 2000. About that time, Wilkes' company was the subject of a Pentagon inspector general's report because of complaints "alleging favoritism and inappropriate actions."

The federal charging document said Cunningham used his position to get funding for programs for the two defense contractors and then pressured Pentagon officials to award them the contracts.

ADCS has received $80 million in Pentagon contracts since 1999, mostly for converting documents into digital format using proprietary software. It was not until late 2003 that Wade's company, MZM Inc., began receiving Pentagon contracts that eventually totaled more than $160 million, mainly for staffing intelligence agencies.

Members of influential congressional committees "have a lot of power and opportunity and are sitting in a place where a lot of money flows," said Gordon Adams, director of security studies at George Washington University and a former White House budget director for national security.

In that environment, corruption goes undetected. "You're never going to catch it every time," Adams said.

That is particularly true of the dozens of programs embedded in the Pentagon's "black budget" accounts hidden in the hundreds of pages of fine print that details defense appropriations legislation. Some of these accounts are labeled "classified activity." Others are identified only by code names.

Because of the required special clearances, the Pentagon and Congress "typically exercise less oversight" on these programs than ones detailed in the open, said Steven M. Kosiak of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington think tank.

Kosiak estimates the size of the "black budget" at $28 billion, including $14.2 billion in purchases of hardware or services and $13.7 billion in classified research and development.

Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have staffers cleared "to at least top secret," said John Scofield, a spokesman for the House panel.

But Steven Aftergood, an expert on government secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit research group in Washington, said the volume of classified budget material has increased while the number of people cleared to see it has not.

Pentagon contracts are supposed to be thoroughly checked by the 3,508 auditors of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, a work force that has shrunk by some 2,000 auditors over the past five years. Information on Cunningham's alleged conspirators and their companies was reported by The Washington Post.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nati...4_bribes30.html
Bee
QUOTE(davisął @ Nov 29 2005, 10:10 AM)
You are a liar. Here is the proof.

The post immediately following the one you are quoting has her real views.
You are a LIAR. You lying Republican hypocrite. You as phony as they are.
[right][snapback]157312[/snapback][/right]


She's at it again? What an obsessive little ninny. I've never seen anyone make up false statements (ineptly and maliciously) to dis other posters with such blatant regularity.

QUOTE(Friend Judy @ Nov 29 2005, 11:53 AM)
And as far as "teach about" vs. "teach", please consider these two statements about Christmas, since it's Christmas season:

1.  This holiday is about the birth of Jesus, the Son of God, the Prince of Peace, who God sent into this world to save mankind from his sins.  This creche shows Mary and the infant Jesus...

2.  This holiday season is a recess we take because most people in this country believe that Jesus is the son of God, the prince of peace, that God sent into this world to save mankind from his sins.  Chanakah, also known as Hannaka, the Jewish "festival of light", is also celebrated this time of year...  There is no reason to believe that Jesus, if there was a Jesus, was actually born in the winter, because...  The Jewish calendar...  The Christian church fixed this time of year to celebrate this holiday because pre-Christian celebrations of the winter solstice...

The first instance is teaching a religious belief.  It states that the belief is TRUE and is the reason for the holiday.  The second instance is teaching ABOUT a religous belief, and explains why "we" take two weeks off to allow individuals to practice their religious beliefs.

[right][snapback]157357[/snapback][/right]


Just so, quite a big difference between "teaching about" and "teaching."

Studying Christianity in History is "teaching about." Pressuring athletes to pray is "teaching."
Bee
QUOTE(davisął @ Nov 30 2005, 08:35 AM)
Fewer auditors, Pentagon secrecy hinder oversight

Pentagon contracts are supposed to be thoroughly checked by the 3,508 auditors of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, a work force that has shrunk by some 2,000 auditors over the past five years. Information on Cunningham's alleged conspirators and their companies was reported by The Washington Post.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nati...4_bribes30.html
[right][snapback]157790[/snapback][/right]


This administration thrives in the dark. Time to let in a little sunshine. Cheney might turn into a bat, but it'll be worth it.
davisął
Nov. 29, 2005, 11:04PM

Democrat probing Abramoff denies connection to lobbyist
Tribe's lawyer asserts Byron Dorgan's political group got $5,000 for letter he wrote

By JOHN SOLOMON and SHARON THEIMER
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - New evidence is emerging that the top Democrat on the Senate committee currently investigating Jack Abramoff got political money arranged by the lobbyist back in 2002 shortly after the lawmaker took action favorable to Abramoff's tribal clients.

A lawyer for the Louisiana Coushatta Indians said that Abramoff instructed the tribe to send $5,000 to Sen. Byron Dorgan's political group just three weeks after the North Dakota Democrat urged fellow senators to fund a tribal school program Abramoff's clients wanted to use.

The check was one of about five dozen the Coushattas listed in a tribal ledger as being issued on March 6, 2002, to various lawmakers' campaigns and political causes at the instruction of Abramoff, tribal attorney Jimmy Faircloth said Monday.

Many of the recipients were lawmakers who had just written letters to the Bush administration or Congress supportive of Abramoff's tribal causes, documents show.

"I am confident of that fact," Faircloth said when asked whether Abramoff had requested the donations listed in a tribal ledger obtained by the Associated Press.

The revelation came as Dorgan took to the offensive Monday, saying there was no connection between the $20,000 in donations he got from Abramoff's firm and tribal clients in spring 2002 and a February 2002 letter he wrote urging the Senate Appropriations Committee to fund the tribal school building program.

Dorgan's letter noted that the Mississippi Choctaw, one of Abramoff's clients, had successfully used the program and requested lawmakers consider long-term funding for it. It made no mention of Abramoff or any of his other tribes that were interested in the program.

Dorgan sharply criticized an AP story last week that divulged he and about a dozen other lawmakers had gotten Abramoff-related donations about the time they sent letters supporting the school building program.

Dorgan told a news conference in North Dakota he had never met Abramoff, did not know about the donations from the lobbyist's clients around the time of his letter and saw no reason to step aside from the Senate Indian Affairs committee investigation of Abramoff.

"I don't have any idea what was contributed to me, or by whom. No contribution has been made to me that was ever represented as a contribution coming from Mr. Abramoff, or any relationship to things that he was involved in," Dorgan said when quizzed about the $20,000 in donations.

Dorgan said he wrote the letter because he supported the tribal school construction program and believed tribes in his state might benefit. "The Bush administration wanted to shut the program down. I disagreed. The program saves the federal government money and gets results. That makes sense to me," he said.

Other checks listed as being issued that day were made out to groups or campaigns associated with Sens. Trent Lott, Mary Landrieu, Harry Reid and John Breaux and Reps. Tom DeLay, Charles Taylor and Pete Session, all of whom wrote letters favorable to Abramoff client causes, the ledger shows.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3492229.html
davisął
Ugly. laugh.gif laugh.gif


Houston & Texas

Nov. 30, 2005, 1:45AM
Bankrupt official refuses to leave retirement board
Ex-TRMPAC treasurer contends Democrats want to embarrass him

By R.G. RATCLIFFE
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN - The former treasurer of a controversial Republican political committee Monday rejected a demand that he resign as a director of the $20 billion state Employee Retirement System because he has filed for personal bankruptcy.

ERS board member Bill Ceverha said the request for his resignation was nothing more than an attempt by Democrats to embarrass him. Ceverha said his bankruptcy has nothing to do with personal financial mismanagement or his role as a trustee of the retirement funds for state employees.

State Rep. Pete Gallego, the Democratic chairman of the Mexican-American Legislative Caucus, said Ceverha should resign from the ERS board because of his bankruptcy filing.

"Your credibility as a board member has been irreparably damaged," Gallego said in a letter to Ceverha. "How can these employees be confident that you will protect their retirement and health benefits when you have proven to be ineffective and incompetent in governing your own personal finances?"

Felony indictment
Gallego said Ceverha also served as the treasurer for Texans for a Republican Majority, a political committee that has been indicted on felony charges of election law violations from the 2002 legislative elections.

"How can Texans rest assured that you will protect their health care and retirement funds when you have shown such blatant disregard for the law?" Gallegos said.

Ceverha, a lobbyist from Dallas and a former legislator, was appointed to the ERS board by House Speaker Tom Craddick.

"Bill Ceverha is a former House member and a longtime, close friend of mine," Craddick said Monday. "His service to ERS is valued, and he should stay on the board."

Ceverha said he is not involved in investing retirement funds as a board member.

Lost lawsuits
Ceverha said he filed for bankruptcy only because losing Democratic legislative candidates from 2002 won one lawsuit against him as treasurer of Texans for a Republican Majority, TRMPAC, and have another lawsuit pending. The bankruptcy filing could spare him from personal liability in the lawsuits. He said his legal fees so far exceed $800,000.

"I just don't have the heart or the money to go through more lawsuits," Ceverha said.

Testimony in the first civil lawsuit showed Ceverha signed TRMPAC campaign finance reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission, but he had little or no personal knowledge of how the committee raised or spent money.

The committee, founded by U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, has been accused of illegally raising corporate money in a scheme to circumvent state election laws to help finance a GOP take-over of the Texas House in the 2002 elections.

DeLay is facing felony indictments of conspiracy to violate election laws, money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering in connection with TRMPAC activities.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/3489541.html
Bee
However did he file for bankruptcy? Must have been before the change in the law. dry.gif
davisął
QUOTE(Bee @ Nov 30 2005, 08:14 AM)
However did he file for bankruptcy? Must have been before the change in the law.  dry.gif
[right][snapback]157805[/snapback][/right]



I didn't think about that. You are probably right.



Hell, he should have waited if the new bankruptcy bill was so great for the US.
Bee
QUOTE(davisął @ Nov 30 2005, 09:16 AM)
I didn't think about that. You are probably right.
Hell, he should have waited if the new bankruptcy bill was so great for the US.
[right][snapback]157806[/snapback][/right]


He signed off on ficticious financial statements and wants to be held exempt? More CEO Republican "law is for the little people" mentality, as well as that unbelievable hubris I mentioned earlier.

He does show both a disregard for the rule of law and for personal responsibility.

Not a person to be in charge of pension funds, for sure.

If he was wiped out because of Katrina it would be understandable. He was wiped out due to his own negligence and failure to do his job.
davisął
ov. 28, 2005, 8:41PM
Rally held to support Tom DeLay

Associated Press

Embattled former House majority leader Tom DeLay criticized Democratic leaders and told supporters at a rally today not to lose faith as he faces charges of campaign finance violations.

"I'm very proud of my relationship with you. I'm very proud of my record," DeLay told the group of more than 100 supporters at a southeastern suburban Houston hotel. "They won't win by criminalizing politics or by the politics of personal destruction because we'll fight them every step of the way."

I'm sorry, there are no words that truly describe just how disgusting this man is. His sheer arrogance is unbelievable.


DeLay, R-Sugar Land, had to step down in September as majority leader after he was indicted in a campaign finance case by a Travis County grand jury.

DeLay and two Republican fund-raisers are accused of illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate donations to GOP candidates for the Texas Legislature. The direct use of corporate money for political purposes is illegal in Texas. All three men deny the charges.

DeLay's trial could be held early next year.

As supporters cheered him on at the rally, a group of about 15 protesters picketed the event from outside the hotel, holding up signs that read "Save America Without DeLay!" and "DeLay Responds to Cash Not Constituents."

"I think he is a very unethical congressman, the worst example of a politician that we have," said Margaret Tyler, 55, a retired chemist, who was one of the protesters.

But inside the hotel, DeLay's supporters had nothing but praise for him.

"Tom, I have always admired you because you do care," said Glenn Goerke, a former University of Houston president who indicated he usually supports Democratic candidates. "When we needed help, we knew we'd get your help. That's the kind of leadership we want in Congress."




$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Martha Ludwig, 79, who attended the rally with her husband Felix, said she's always been a DeLay supporter and she believes he won't be convicted.

"I think the Democrats are still a little bit disgusted with Bush winning again," she said. "I believe he'll be re-elected. We really need him."

During his short speech, DeLay criticized Democratic leaders, saying they have no agenda and do not want to make the country safe by fighting terrorism in Iraq and abroad.

"This isn't about me. It's about this community, it's about this state, it's about this nation that we're all fighting for," he said.


not even close.

DeLay's likely Democratic opponent in 2006, former U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson, said today's rally was a failed attempt by the former majority leader to show he still has voter support.

"Tom DeLay is losing support here by the day. The crowd is booing, the hook is out and Tom DeLay is trying to shuffle his way out of trouble just like Bugs Bunny in one of those old cartoons," Lampson said.






http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/3489288.html


user posted image
Arturo_Vandelay
QUOTE(Friend Judy @ Nov 30 2005, 12:26 AM)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...5112801678.html

The thing that always puzzles me about this sort of grand scale corruption is that in the midst of the zillion-dollar bribes, you always find a bunch of such utter petty shit.  Bernie Ebbers loots his company of gazillions, and in the middle of long list you find a $100 bill for flowers for someone's birthday.  Abramoff comps a $250 lunch for DeLay.  Ken Lay has Enron pay his maid.

I just don't get that mentality.  Why, in midst of the wholesale plundering of millions, does somene fart around with, quite literally, a free lunch?
[right][snapback]157755[/snapback][/right]


It becomes an entitlement mentality. Why won't Hillary tip on a free meal, and why does Cynthia McKinney need a government SUV to take her literally 50 yards to work?
davisął
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Nov 30 2005, 09:47 AM)
It becomes an entitlement mentality. Why won't Hillary tip on a free meal, and why does Cynthia McKinney need a government SUV to take her literally 50 yards to work?
[right][snapback]157835[/snapback][/right]



Well isn't that nice? I want my SUV too!!! Waaa!!


laugh.gif laugh.gif

Pigsnout.
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE
Ohio lawmaker lining up votes to replace DeLay

November 27, 2005

BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

There is no doubt Rep. John Boehner of Ohio is quietly enlisting support from fellow House Republicans to elect him as majority leader in January. The question is whether Rep. Tom Reynolds of New York is campaigning to be majority whip.

Reports of a Boehner-Reynolds ticket have circulated in Washington, but Reynolds vigorously denies it. If he does run for whip, Reynolds would be accused of cutting and running from his duties as House Republican campaign chairman because of the difficult 2006 mid-term election ahead.

A special election in January would mean House Republicans have given up on Tom DeLay getting rid of his criminal indictment in Texas in time to resume the majority leader's chair in this session of Congress. Majority Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri has been acting leader.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak27.html
underhi2p
The kewl aspect with the Cunningham deal is the rest of the monkees in Congress are adhering to the don't ask, don't tell ethics guidelines.

Rock on brother.

Peace out.

davisął
Contractor spends big on key lawmakers
By Matt Kelley and Jim Drinkard, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — A San Diego businessman under investigation in the bribery case of former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham is a well-known GOP fundraiser whose generosity to key members of Congress came at the same time his company saw large increases in its government contracts, public records show.
Rep. Randy Cunningham pled guilty to conspiring to commit bribery, honest services fraud, and tax evasion. Rep. Randy Cunningham pled guilty to conspiring to commit bribery, honest services fraud, and tax evasion.
By Lenny Ignelzi, AP

Brent Wilkes, the founder of defense contractor ADCS Inc., gave more than $840,000 in contributions to 32 House members or candidates, campaign-finance records show. He flew Republican lawmakers on his private jet and hired lobbyists with close ties to those lawmakers.

Wilkes' charitable foundation, which aids sick children and military families, honored congressmen at black-tie banquets and donated to their favorite causes. Wilkes was also a "Pioneer" for President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, meaning he raised at least $100,000.

With help from two committee chairmen, ADCS got more than $90 million in government contracts since its founding in 1995, helping propel Wilkes from an obscure businessman to a millionaire prominent in Republican circles.

Neither Wilkes nor any other congressmen have been charged with crimes, and the donations and contributions are legal so long as they weren't intended to influence official actions. The links illustrate the connections between lawmakers who oversee defense spending and a contractor seeking some of that money.

Cunningham resigned Monday after pleading guilty to tax evasion and conspiracy to accept bribes. He admitted accepting $2.4 million in bribes from two defense contractors and two other businessmen in exchange for helping those companies get contracts. (Related story: Bribed congressman resigns, pleads guilty to charges)

Wilkes, whose home and company headquarters were searched by federal agents this year during the Cunningham investigation, wasn't named in the plea documents. The documents say "co-conspirator No. 1" spent more than $636,000 on Cunningham. Wilkes' attorney, Michael Lipman, acknowledged that his client is "co-conspirator No. 1." He declined to comment further about the case.

Contributions to chairmen

Since 1994, Wilkes and ADCS gave $40,700 in campaign contributions to Rep. Duncan Hunter, a San Diego Republican who now chairs the House Armed Services Committee. Hunter has acknowledged that he joined with Cunningham in 1999 to contact Pentagon officials who reversed a decision and gave ADCS one of its first big contracts, for nearly $10 million. Hunter's spokesman, Joe Kasper, said the congressman was unavailable for comment Tuesday.

Another California Republican, Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis, led panels that ordered the Pentagon to continue programs that aided ADCS when Pentagon officials wanted to cut them. Lewis got $71,253 from Wilkes and his employees in donations since 1993. Wilkes gave Lewis donations and met him at various events, Lewis spokesman Jim Specht said, but "he never talked with him about a defense project."

Before becoming the Appropriations chairman this year, Lewis led the subcommittee that oversees defense spending. In the late 1990s, that panel directed the Pentagon to continue converting paper documents to computer records, the work that ADCS does. Pentagon officials had tried to end the program's funding.

The 1999 defense budget, for example, directed $45 million be spent on document conversion. Wilkes and his employees gave Lewis $7,000 in campaign contributions the day after his subcommittee's first hearing on the bill.

After the Pentagon declined to give ADCS a contract, it awarded the company a $9.8 million deal in mid-1999 after "inquiries from two members of Congress," a Defense investigation found. Hunter and Cunningham have said they asked Pentagon officials about the program.

The money went to ADCS instead of projects for the Army's UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter, Air Force bases, and a parts center in Oklahoma, according to the report by the Pentagon inspector general, prompted by a request from a Defense official.

Valuable in-the-air time

Wilkes' ties to Hunter and Cunningham go beyond campaign contributions. In 2003, the businessman's foundation hosted a "Salute to Heroes" gala to give Hunter an award, just as it did for Cunningham a year earlier. The Wilkes Foundation gave $1,000 in 2003 to a charity run by two of Hunter's staffers, records show.

Wilkes also provided a jet that Cunningham and other Republicans used for more than a dozen flights to campaign fundraising events since 2001, records show.

Providing flights gives donors a chance for hours of one-on-one contact with the lawmaker they want to influence, said Keith Ashdown of the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

"Most other lobbyists would give up their second lung to get that kind of access," Ashdown said. "It's not always illegal, but it's definitely a strategy of influence that's unparalleled."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20...gham-case_x.htm
SherryB
I finally got caught up. I can't remember now if it was FJ or bee posting about the group prayer at football games but I've always thought it was so silly to pray about a football game. Both sides are praying, are they praying to win?? In the vast universe of things one would think a God would have to worry about, counting the sparrows as they fall, etc., would God actually take the time or care about the outcome of a football game?? Isn't it rather demeaning to GOD to pray for something as trivial as that? OR are they praying that they not get injured during the game which would involve GOD actually to be in there during the game protecting each prayer giver. If the said player still gets injured, didn't GOD care? OR is it just HIS will? Just pondering on the question.

Hubby was watching Joe Scarborough last night, he thought Joe was a democrat, but anyway, Joe said he expects 60 republicans to be indicted soon. Now I have to wait until I can get the transcripts of last nights show to find out if it has to do with the Abramoff investigation or the bribe thing. So many crooks you can't keep up.




Friend Judy
It was me, Sherry, and yes, that's where my own religion conflicts with the coach's. It's offensive and demeaning to God to pray for such things (and of course, the concommitant concept that God has caused the other team to lose), as is "Praise Jesus!" for a field goal, as if God had directed the ball between the goal posts or caused an opposing player to fumble.

Fortunately, the coach is now off teaching at a Christian school, where he should have been all along.
Russ Logan
davis

Intersting USA Today article. Led me to wonder who the other 29 names (not listed in the USA Today piece) were so I went to the FEC website and their searcahble database for individual contributors - curious, a few fairly highly placed Dems among the pack. Even more curious they list Mr Wilkes total as being $149K and change, not $840K. text of my sesarch resultes on "Wilkes, Brent":

"Presented by the Federal Election Commission



Individual Contributions Arranged By Type, Giver, Then Recipient

Contributions to Political Committees

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064

DICKEY, JAY W JR
VIA DICKEY FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
06/30/1999 1000.00 99034704435

ROGAN, JAMES E
VIA ROGAN FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
07/09/1999 1000.00 20035204512

WILSON, HEATHER A.
VIA HEATHER WILSON FOR CONGRESS
07/29/1999 1000.00 20035201602

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS

MCCOLLUM, BILL
VIA BILL MCCOLLUM FOR US SENATE
08/31/2004 2000.00 24020903385

PACKARD, RONALD C
VIA FRIENDS OF RON PACKARD
04/14/1999 1000.00 99034731400

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC

ABRAHAM, SPENCER SENATOR
VIA ABRAHAM SENATE 2000
11/29/1999 1000.00 20020072785

GRAHAM, LINDSEY OLIN
VIA LINDSEY GRAHAM FOR SENATE
04/23/2001 1000.00 24020330331

HUTCHISON, CLAUDE B JR
VIA CLAUDE HUTCHISON FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
09/24/2000 250.00 20036132502

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC./PRESIDENT

BAYOU LEADER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
06/28/2001 5000.00 21990215792

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC/EXECUTIVE

BONILLA, HENRY
VIA TEXANS FOR HENRY BONILLA
03/08/2002 1000.00 22991081426

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
GROUP ADVISORS CORP. SERVICES/PRE

SAN DIEGO COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE
10/30/2004 5000.00 24981596595

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
GROUP W ADVISORS/PRESIDENT

HOEKSTRA, PETER
VIA PETER HOEKSTRA FOR CONGRESS
02/15/2005 1000.00 25990459513

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
GROUP W/PRES.

SUPERIOR CALIFORNIA FEDERAL LEADERSHIP FUND
02/10/2004 5000.00 24990724354
04/07/2005 5000.00 25990741710

WILKES, BRENT
POWAY, CA 92064
WILKES CORPORATION/PRESIDENT

KNOLLENBERG, JOSEPH K
VIA KNOLLENBERG FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
06/19/2004 2000.00 24961801163

WILKES, BRENT
WASHINGTON, DC 20002
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMER

BECERRA, XAVIER
VIA BECERRA FOR CONGRESS
11/09/2000 500.00 20036633986

WILKES, BRENT
WASHINGTON, DC 20036
LULAC/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

BECERRA, XAVIER
VIA BECERRA FOR CONGRESS
10/22/2003 1000.00 24990321889

WILKES, BRENT
WASHINGTON, DC 20037
ADCS INC

CRAIG, LARRY E
VIA CRAIG FOR U S SENATE
10/01/2000 1000.00 21020021901

WILKES, BRENT A MR.
MC LEAN, VA 22101
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN C

RODRIGUEZ, CIRO D
VIA CIRO D RODRIGUEZ FOR CONGRESS
02/03/2004 1000.00 24990696654

WILKES, BRENT A.
MCLEAN, VA 22101
LEAGUE UNITED LATIN AMER CITIZENS

BACA, JOE
VIA FRIENDS OF JOE BACA
05/03/2001 500.00 21990371634

WILKES, BRENT MR.
MCLEAN, VA 22101
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN C

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE - CONTRIBUTIONS
10/15/2002 500.00 22992461437

WILKES, BRENT MR.
POWAY, CA 92064
WILKES CORPORATION/PRESIDENT/CEO

ADCS INC PAC
06/30/2002 1346.00 22991399942
11/25/2002 576.00 22992957841
12/31/2004 4038.00 25980405840

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064

CALVERT, KEN MR.
VIA KEN CALVERT FOR CONGRESS
06/08/1998 1000.00 98033341674
06/08/1998 1000.00 98033341674

WARNER, JOHN WILLIAM
VIA FRIENDS OF JOHN WARNER 1996 COMMITTEE
05/04/1999 500.00 99020064296

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
ACDS, INC

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS
11/03/1999 1000.00 20035162302

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS

BUILDING OUR BASES (BOBS) PAC
07/03/1998 5000.00 98033743413

LEWIS, JERRY
VIA LEWIS FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
02/04/1998 1000.00 98032972549
02/04/1998 1000.00 98032972548
04/15/1999 1000.00 99034700883
04/15/1999 1000.00 99034700884

ROBB, CHARLES S
VIA ROBB FOR THE SENATE
06/27/1997 1000.00 97020071354
04/16/1999 1000.00 99020064098

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC

ADCS INC PAC
12/29/1999 5000.00 20035242384

GILMAN, BENJAMIN A
VIA CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR GILMAN FOR CONGRESS
10/17/1998 1000.00 98033982943
09/05/2000 1000.00 20036123578

HAYES, ROBERT CANNON
VIA HAYES FOR CONGRESS
06/30/1999 1000.00 99034673608

HUNTER, DUNCAN
VIA COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER
10/04/1999 1000.00 20035172952
10/18/1999 1000.00 20035172952

OBEY, DAVID R
VIA LOT OF PEOPLE FOR DAVE OBEY
05/21/1999 1000.00 99034722927

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
AIMCO SERVICES

LINCOLN CLUB OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
02/13/1997 1000.00 97032313709

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
AUDCS INC

INOUYE, DANIEL K
VIA DANIEL K INOUYE IN 98
06/05/1998 1000.00 98020154051

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
AUDRE INC

HUNTER, DUNCAN
VIA COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER
03/31/1998 1000.00 98032993322

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
AUTOMATED DOCUMENT CONVERSION SYS

BILBRAY, BRIAN P
VIA BRIAN BILBRAY FOR CONGRESS
05/30/1998 1000.00 98033380310
10/26/1998 1000.00 98033944476
04/05/1999 1000.00 99034733736
07/07/1999 1000.00 20035153348

INOUYE, DANIEL K
VIA DANIEL K INOUYE IN 98
09/29/1998 1000.00 98020232417

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
CONSULTANT

CUNNINGHAM, RANDY DUKE
VIA FRIENDS OF DUKE CUNNINGHAM
07/28/1997 1000.00 98032804032
06/14/1998 1000.00 98033341435

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92064
THE WILKES CORP./PRESIDENT/CEO

AMERICANS FOR A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
04/12/2002 5000.00 25990884493
09/30/2004 5000.00 24971858599

FUTURE LEADERS PAC
09/26/2003 2000.00 25980486645

PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH PAC
09/09/2004 5000.00 24971767474

WILKES, BRENT R
POWAY, CA 92604
ADCS INC

YOUNG, C. W. BILL
VIA CONGRESSMAN BILL YOUNG CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
11/03/1998 1000.00 98034050163

WILKES, BRENT R
WASHINGTON, DC 20037
ADCS INC

YOUNG, C. W. BILL
VIA CONGRESSMAN BILL YOUNG CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
10/18/2000 1000.00 20036383753

WILKES, BRENT R MR.
POWAY, CA 92064
ACDS INC./PRESIDENT

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE
07/11/2003 25000.00 23991766830

WILKES, BRENT R MR.
POWAY, CA 92064
WILKES CORPORATION/PRESIDENT

BUSH, GEORGE W
VIA BUSH-CHENEY '04 (PRIMARY) INC
06/26/2003 2000.00 23991423426

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
ACDS/CEO

ALLIANCE FOR THE WEST
06/28/2004 5000.00 24961817152

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC./PRESIDENT

AMERICAN PROSPERITY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
10/10/2001 5000.00 22991925557

FUTURE LEADERS PAC
09/18/2002 1000.00 22992333789

HUNTER, DUNCAN
VIA COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER
02/22/2001 1000.00 21990245410
06/29/2001 1000.00 21990245411

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC./PRESIDENT & CEO

GARCIA, MARIA GUADALUPE
VIA GARCIA FOR CONGRESS
10/11/2002 1000.00 22992506595

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
GROUP ADVISORS/ADCS/PRESIDENT

ISSA, DARRELL EDWARD
VIA ISSA FOR CONGRESS
10/27/2004 2000.00 24981541898

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
SELF- EMPLOYED/LOBBYIST

SPENCE, FLOYD DAVIDSON
VIA SPENCE FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE
06/29/2001 1000.00 21990357229

WILKES, BRENT R.
POWAY, CA 92064
THE WILKES CORP./PRESIDENT/CEO

AMERICANS FOR A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
08/14/2003 5000.00 23991948441

WILKES, BRENT R. MR.
POWAY, CA 92064
ADCS INC./GOV'T RELATIONS

STUMP, BOB
VIA BOB STUMP ELECTION COMMITTEE
06/27/2001 1000.00 21990368323

WILKES, BRENT R. MR.
POWAY, CA 92064
SELF/CONSULTANT

CUNNINGHAM, RANDY DUKE
VIA FRIENDS OF DUKE CUNNINGHAM
04/24/2001 1000.00 21990302636
04/24/2001 1000.00 21990302636

Total Contributions: 149210.00

TRY A: NEW QUERY
RETURN TO: FEC HOME PAGE "

Not of course that anything is illegal in contributing to a campaign or PAC - Rep Cunningham's admission to bribery, as in being bribable (is that a word?) - makes me wonder - will Mr Wilkes be acquitted of making the bribe Rep Cunnigham has pled guilty to taking? (A reverse of the Secretary Espy situation where Diamond Grocers were found guilty of giving a gift that Sec. Espy was acquitted of taking).

Ahh DC politics - The Sufferors of Potomac Fever continue to amaze. But do little to delight.
davisął
they've turned out de light.
davisął
House Intelligence Panel to Probe Cunningham
By Greg Miller, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON -- The House Intelligence Committee plans to investigate whether former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who resigned this week after pleading guilty to bribery charges, abused his position on the intelligence panel to steer spy agency contracts to favored companies, the committee's chairman said today.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) said the probe would focus on whether Cunningham, a Republican, used his position to influence spending on classified programs that benefited companies that offered him bribes, as well as whether he used his access to classified information to give such companies an advantage.


"He's pleaded guilty to some very, very serious charges," Hoekstra said in a telephone interview. "At this point, he no longer gets the benefit of the doubt. We now need to look at worst-case scenarios."

The inquiry by the intelligence panel opens a new front in the effort to determine the scope of Cunningham's influence-peddling crimes, which rank among the most brazen in recent congressional history.

The 63-year-old former congressman from Rancho Santa Fe, a former Top Gun pilot and decorated war veteran, pleaded guilty Monday to taking $2.4 million in bribes and evading more than $1 million in taxes.

An ongoing federal investigation of Cunningham has focused primarily on his use of his position as a member of the appropriations panel, which sets funding priorities for the Pentagon, to help several San Diego-area companies win millions of dollars in defense contracts.

Cunningham's role as a member of the House Intelligence Committee, which sets the spending priorities for the nation's 15 spy agencies and oversees their clandestine activities, has come under less scrutiny.

Cunningham became a member of the committee in 2001, and more recently served as chairman of a subcommittee on terrorism, human intelligence, analysis and counterintelligence.

In those positions, he had access to information on an array of classified programs managed by spy agencies that get an estimated $40 billion in funding each year. Cunningham's district is home to an assortment of defense contractors and other companies that do classified, intelligence-related work.

Shortly after joining the committee in 2001, Cunningham sent a letter to executives at a dozen companies in his district touting his new position.

"I feel fortunate to represent the nation's top technological talent in the 'black' world," Cunningham said in the letter, referring to classified programs whose 'black' budgets are not publicly disclosed.

The Feb. 8, 2001 letter went on to say he "appreciated the opportunity to work with you on key service funding priorities," and that his new position would lead to "even greater opportunities to work together in support of our national security and intelligence communities."

Among the recipients of the letter was Brent Wilkes, the founder of Poway-based ADCS Inc., whose dealings with Cunningham are under investigation. The computer technology company helped steer tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions to Cunningham, and provided other perks, including flights on a corporate jet.

Harmony Allen, Cunningham's chief of staff, said the letter was an invitation to a town hall-style discussion that the congressman routinely held with leaders of various business sectors in his district.

Hoekstra said he had seen no evidence to date that Cunningham used his intelligence committee position to commit crimes, but said "the charges that he's pled guilty to are ugly and they are about as ugly as you can get for somebody on the intelligence committee with access to secret information."

Hoekstra said he would seek a meeting with officials at the Justice Department next week to discuss Cunningham's crimes, and help determine a course for the committee's probe. Rep. Jane Harman (D-Redondo Beach), the ranking Democrat on the committee, declined to comment.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/na...-home-headlines
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE(davisął @ Nov 30 2005, 06:36 PM)
House Intelligence Panel to Probe Cunningham
By Greg Miller, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON -- The House Intelligence Committee plans to investigate whether former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who resigned this week after pleading guilty to bribery charges, abused his position on the intelligence panel to steer spy agency contracts to favored companies, the committee's chairman said today.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) said the probe would focus on whether Cunningham, a Republican, used his position to influence spending on classified programs that benefited companies that offered him bribes, as well as whether he used his access to classified information to give such companies an advantage.
"He's pleaded guilty to some very, very serious charges," Hoekstra said in a telephone interview. "At this point, he no longer gets the benefit of the doubt. We now need to look at worst-case scenarios."

The inquiry by the intelligence panel opens a new front in the effort to determine the scope of Cunningham's influence-peddling crimes, which rank among the most brazen in recent congressional history.

The 63-year-old former congressman from Rancho Santa Fe, a former Top Gun pilot and decorated war veteran, pleaded guilty Monday to taking $2.4 million in bribes and evading more than $1 million in taxes.

An ongoing federal investigation of Cunningham has focused primarily on his use of his position as a member of the appropriations panel, which sets funding priorities for the Pentagon, to help several San Diego-area companies win millions of dollars in defense contracts.

Cunningham's role as a member of the House Intelligence Committee, which sets the spending priorities for the nation's 15 spy agencies and oversees their clandestine activities, has come under less scrutiny.

Cunningham became a member of the committee in 2001, and more recently served as chairman of a subcommittee on terrorism, human intelligence, analysis and counterintelligence.

In those positions, he had access to information on an array of classified programs managed by spy agencies that get an estimated $40 billion in funding each year. Cunningham's district is home to an assortment of defense contractors and other companies that do classified, intelligence-related work.

Shortly after joining the committee in 2001, Cunningham sent a letter to executives at a dozen companies in his district touting his new position.

"I feel fortunate to represent the nation's top technological talent in the 'black' world," Cunningham said in the letter, referring to classified programs whose 'black' budgets are not publicly disclosed.

The Feb. 8, 2001 letter went on to say he "appreciated the opportunity to work with you on key service funding priorities," and that his new position would lead to "even greater opportunities to work together in support of our national security and intelligence communities."

Among the recipients of the letter was Brent Wilkes, the founder of Poway-based ADCS Inc., whose dealings with Cunningham are under investigation. The computer technology company helped steer tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions to Cunningham, and provided other perks, including flights on a corporate jet.

Harmony Allen, Cunningham's chief of staff, said the letter was an invitation to a town hall-style discussion that the congressman routinely held with leaders of various business sectors in his district.

Hoekstra said he had seen no evidence to date that Cunningham used his intelligence committee position to commit crimes, but said "the charges that he's pled guilty to are ugly and they are about as ugly as you can get for somebody on the intelligence committee with access to secret information."

Hoekstra said he would seek a meeting with officials at the Justice Department next week to discuss Cunningham's crimes, and help determine a course for the committee's probe. Rep. Jane Harman (D-Redondo Beach), the ranking Democrat on the committee, declined to comment.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/na...-home-headlines
[right][snapback]157972[/snapback][/right]


I wonder if some of these companies "computer services" will be spying on Americans here at home?

Crooks spying on Americans, bribing Congressmen to get the business.

Put’s the crooks in position to blackmail congressmen and citizens too.

Kewel.

Silver or lead.

Like the drug cartels down in South America.

Welcome to the Big Banana Republic.
Repub_Bub
QUOTE(SherryB @ Nov 30 2005, 08:32 PM)
I finally got caught up.  I can't remember now if it was FJ or bee posting about the group prayer at football games but I've always thought it was so silly to pray about a football game.  Both sides are praying, are they praying to win??  In the vast universe of things one would think a God would have to worry about, counting the sparrows as they fall, etc., would God actually take the time or care about the outcome of a football game??  Isn't it rather demeaning to GOD to pray for something as trivial as that?  OR are they praying that they not get injured during the game which would involve GOD actually to be in there during the game protecting each prayer giver.  If the said player still gets injured, didn't GOD care?  OR is it just HIS will?  Just pondering on the question.


It's obvious, Sherry...and Friend Judy will most certainly atttest...that only a certain few humans are privy to the mind of God.

You're correct, of course, to be concerned... but if you're in actual doubt about what God thinks about any given situation, FJ will certainly provide you with an answer.
Bee
QUOTE(Friend Judy @ Nov 30 2005, 03:39 PM)
It was me, Sherry, and yes, that's where my own religion conflicts with the coach's.  It's offensive and demeaning to God to pray for such things (and of course, the concommitant concept that God has caused the other team to lose), as is "Praise Jesus!" for a field goal, as if God had directed the ball between the goal posts or caused an opposing player to fumble.

Fortunately, the coach is now off teaching at a Christian school, where he should have been all along.
[right][snapback]157920[/snapback][/right]


Today Hastert changed the Capitol 'Holiday Tree' to a 'Christmas Tree.' Of course there are no questions about the leader of the house endorsing a religion.

Poor put upon evangelicals... they only want the right to dictate how everyone else has to believe. That's all.

dry.gif
Bart Katz
WTF? Tree worshiping bastiges. sad.gif
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE(Bart Katz @ Nov 30 2005, 07:47 PM)
WTF? Tree worshiping bastiges.  sad.gif
[right][snapback]157993[/snapback][/right]

user posted image
QUOTE
The O'Reilly Factor Holiday Ornament
Product #: FOX21000900  Price: $6.97

Order Qty: 
Silver glass with red The O'Reilly Factor logo on one hemisphere and FOX News Channel logo opposite. Metal cap and hoop for hanging.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,177145,00.html


Bastidges. smile.gif
Bart Katz
QUOTE(SpaceCowboy @ Nov 30 2005, 07:54 PM)
user posted image
Bastidges.  smile.gif
[right][snapback]157995[/snapback][/right]


That cork soaking mortar forker. sad.gif
Arturo_Vandelay
How much without the hoop?
SpaceCowboy
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Nov 30 2005, 08:09 PM)
How much without the hoop?
[right][snapback]158002[/snapback][/right]
I dunno. The one with Fox and Friends sells for more.
QUOTE
user posted image
FOX & Friends Holiday Ornament
Product #: FOX21001000  Price: $9.95

Order Qty: 
Silver glass with red the FOX & Friends logo on one hemisphere and FOX News Channel logo opposite. Metal cap and hoop for hanging.


Testimony to the marketing power of blondes with good legs.
davisął
Do they sell a hypno coin?
davisął
This is cool.


Honesty pays for California cabbie



Wednesday, November 30, 2005

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Two weeks ago, Haider Sediqi reunited a passenger with $350,000 in diamonds that the man had left in his taxicab.

Now, Sediqi's act of honesty has turned to gold.

The New York jeweler who forgot the bag of diamonds sent Sediqi a $10,000 check and a diamond bracelet. Sediqi said the man's thank-you note meant just as much to him.

"The guy, he said I changed his life," Sediqi said. "That's very important."

Eric Austein left the diamonds in Sediqi's cab Nov. 16 when he got out at Los Angeles International Airport. Sediqi tracked him down through a cell phone bill he found inside the bag.

Austein promised him a reward, but Sediqi said he didn't think much about it - until it arrived a few days ago.

Sediqi, 40, said he considered using the money to pay off credit card debt but decided to save it to help pay for his children's schooling. He gave the bracelet to his wife, Nasima.

http://www.pjstar.com/stories/113005/PM__B89FENDJ.NW1.shtml
davisął
Wright and Wrong and Cunningham
The WSJ's editorial page's long-term memory loss.
By Jack Shafer
Posted Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2005, at 6:31 PM ET

Today's Wall Street Journal editorial page title damns all to hell Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Calif., who yesterday pleaded guilty to taking bribes from defense contractors and resigned from Congress (see "Duke of the Beltway," Nov. 29).

Two-thirds of the way through its spanking of Cunningham the Journal reaches back 16 years to assert a moral equivalence between him and Jim Wright, the disgraced speaker of the House who was driven from office in 1989 by his own scandal. The page writes:

Mr. Cunningham's graft doesn't mean that all Republicans are corrupt, any more than former Speaker Jim Wright's machinations meant all Democrats were on the take.



The peculiar juxtaposition of "Cunningham's graft" to "Wright's machinations" suggests that the two pols' misdeeds are somehow equivalent. But comparing Cunningham's offenses to Wright's is like comparing a Brink's job with the looting of a Pez dispenser. Cunningham confessed to "evading taxes and conspiring to pocket $2.4 million in bribes, including a Rolls-Royce, a yacht and a 19th-century Louis-Philippe commode," as the Washington Post reports today. He faces 10 years in prison.

Wright, on the other hand, made a sweetheart deal with a printer to publish a book of speeches that netted him $55,000. Wright wrongly lobbied the savings and loan regulators to go easy on two bank owners who ultimately went to prison for, among other things, fraud. Wright's printer buddy put wife Betty Wright on the payroll where she did little or no work. These transgressions and others committed by Wright never translated into jail time. So, where's the equivalence? Why bring Wright up now? Does the page have a guilty conscience about its central role in toppling him?


As for the Journal's 2005 notion that Wright's sins didn't taint other Democrats, the same page took a very different view in 1988 and 1989, insisting that the speaker's perfidy belonged to all Democrats, as these excerpts show.

Common Cause, a liberal watchdog group, called for an investigation last week of House Speaker Jim Wright's tangled business dealings. The next day, House Democrats rose and gave the Speaker a standing ovation. These are the same House Democrats who demand that Attorney General Meese resign if the merest puff of ethical smoke blows out of the independent counsel's office. But they are disinclined to look into the affairs of the man who is second in the line of presidential succession.

—May 24, 1988

While the Ethics Committee has been dithering over what to do about the Wright charges, one of its members, Vic Fazio of California, featured Speaker Wright at an unpublicized $500-a-plate fund-raiser in California last June 22. … [M]uch of the proceeds went to a program … which works to elect Democrats to state legislatures where they can preserve the gerrymandered districts that keep Messr. Wright and Fazio in power. … Last week the 177 House Republicans unanimously called on Mr. Fazio to step aside from the Wright investigation. …

When reporters recently asked about his ethics problems, Jim Wright responded by announcing, "I am not a pariah." Sure isn't. You can see for yourself on national television.

—July 19, 1988

[H]ardly anyone expects the Democrats on this [bipartisan ethics] committee to vote for sanctions against the man they just re-elected as Speaker of the House. How could Jim Wright remain third in line for the presidency if the full House were asked to reprimand him?

—Jan. 11, 1989

Former Interior Secretary James Watt is excoriated for writing a letter to Sam Pierce asking special attention for a client. But Congresspersons write letters every day on behalf of constituents (we almost said contributors), interceding with agency heads, Pentagon officials and savings-and-loan regulators.

They have been known to go even further, which is why former Speaker Wright and former Majority Whip Tony Coelho are no longer in the legislation business. …

Jim Wright and Tony Coelho were doing favors for their friends in the thrift business by heading off efforts by federal regulators to shut down some of the worst operators. Maybe folks working for Sam Pierce thought they should be friendly to Jim Watt, a loyal Republican who had suffered hard times in Washington.

—June 21, 1989

Whatever the outcome of the [savings and loan] bailout bill itself, President Bush ought to insist that Congress not sweep aside the role that public officials and Members of Congress from Jim Wright, Tony Coelho and Alan Cranston on down played in creating the crisis.

—Aug. 4, 1989

Now that the investigation of Jim Wright is concluding, the House of Representatives, and especially its Democratic majority, is on public probation. If Democrats try to exonerate Mr. Wright and keep the Phelan report from public view or to short-circuit the disciplinary process, it will be obvious that Congress's concern about ethics is hollow. It will be obvious that ethics is a disguised political weapon, designed to weaken the executive branch and to protect the political castle called Congress.

—March 13, 1989


Every editorial page has a right to change its mind, of course. The page was edited by Robert Bartley back in 1988-89 and has been edited since 2002 by Paul Gigot, so maybe its sentiments about Wright's corruption bleeding onto Democrats are now inoperative. So, too, might be its qualms about the dangers posed by the perpetual incumbency. On April 17, 1989, when Democrats held what looked like a permanent lock on the House and the Wright menace flared, the page fretted:

The real scandal is not Jim Wright's book, but the entrenchment of incumbents in Congress. Districts are gerrymandered. Perhaps worse, every impulse toward campaign "reform" is twisted into another incumbent-protection device. Next year, Congress will spend $114 million to send self-promoting franked mail to voters. That is more than all the funds raised by all House and Senate challengers in the 1988 election. Unless some way can be found to restore competition, we will have to start thinking about limiting the number of terms Congressmen can serve.

The next day, April 18, the page repeated its fears about the connection between incumbency and corruption:

Washington has become ethically loose because it has become so politically flabby. The incumbency rate in the House is now 99%. Real politics, unlike Washington's, includes real competition for an institution's seats of power. It includes accountability, so that challengers can criticize their opponent's votes. The current Washington system is designed to minimize these forces. No corporation or any other private institution could remain vibrant or viable for long without competition or accountability. Congress can't either.


Now that Republican incumbents have squeezed the political competition out of Congress, does the Journal still equate political flabbiness with corruption?

http://www.slate.com/id/2131207/?nav=fix
davisął
WASHINGTON - Five oil industry executives acknowledged frequent company contacts with government officials to discuss energy issues but insisted they had responded truthfully at a recent Senate hearing when they denied participating in Vice President


Dick Cheney's 2001 energy task force.


The exchange at the Nov. 9 hearing prompted accusations by some Democratic senators that several of the executives may have knowingly misled Congress. A report published a few days later found that White House logs showed representatives of some of the companies had visited energy task force officials.

New Mexico Sens. Pete Domenici, chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Jeff Bingaman, its ranking Democrat, asked the executives to clarify any discrepancies.

The senators released the executives' written responses on Wednesday.

John Hofmeister, chairman of Shell Oil Co., said Shell representatives did not meet with the task force but added, "Shell representatives did meet with the administration — including the vice president and his staff — on a broad range of energy policy issues."

Exxon Mobil Corp. said its chairman, Lee Raymond, responded accurately when he said no one at the company participated in a task force meeting — as the question was phrased by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (news, bio, voting record), D-N.J.

In its letter, however, Exxon Mobil confirmed that company officials met with a Bush administration official for 45 minutes on Feb. 14, 2001, to discuss the "global energy supply and demand situation." On the same day, the company said, the same information was given to members of Congress and others. The Cheney task force issued its report on energy priorities in May 2001.

Lautenberg called the executives' clarifications "corporate doublespeak that only further demonstrates the need for a criminal investigation" of their Nov. 9 testimony. He said he planned to discuss the issue further with Justice Department officials on Thursday.

There was no indication that either Domenici or Bingaman planned to press matters further. The White House has steadfastly refused to provide a list of oil companies that provided information to the Cheney task force, going to court to fight attempts to obtain such information.

Ross Pillari, chairman of BP America Inc., said Nov. 9 he did not know whether anyone from his company participated in any task force matters.

In his clarification, Pillari reiterated that he was "not personally involved in energy policy issues" in 2001. After looking into the issue further, he confirmed that "BP representatives did meet with (task force) staff members."

They "provided them with comments on a range of energy policy matters," wrote Pillari, adding, "We provided comments and information much like we continue to do on a routine basis with members of Congress and the administration."

James Mulva, chairman of ConocoPhillips, also insisted that he had responded accurately when he said his company did not participate in the Cheney task force. In 2001, Conoco and Phillips Petroleum Co. had not yet merged into ConocoPhillips.

Mulva said he had since learned that Archie Dunham, chairman of Conoco, and another Conoco official "had attended or participated in a task force meeting in 2001," but said he had never discussed the task force with Dunham.

He said ConocoPhillips representatives have had "many meetings with various members of the administration. ... We value greatly our opportunities to provide information, assistance and our company's perspective concerning energy policy."

David O'Reilly, chairman of Chevron Corp., wrote that Chevron representatives "did not attend any meetings with administration officials or staff for the purpose of discussing (Cheney) task force activities." But O'Reilly attached to his reply a letter he sent
President Bush on Feb. 5, 2001, emphasizing "we need to increase our energy supply" and discussing other energy issues.

"Chevron personnel routinely have and did have discussions on U.S. energy policy with officials in the administration and their staff," O'Reilly wrote in his response to Domenici and Bingaman.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=.../oil_executives
Arturo_Vandelay
QUOTE(SpaceCowboy @ Nov 30 2005, 07:15 PM)
I dunno. The one with Fox and Friends sells for more.
Testimony to the marketing power of blondes with good legs.
[right][snapback]158003[/snapback][/right]


Makes me willing to spend some money. I always kinda liked ED, the new blond on the weekends is ok too.
Arturo_Vandelay
QUOTE(davisął @ Nov 30 2005, 07:35 PM)

James Mulva, chairman of ConocoPhillips


Mulva? As in rhymes with a female body part?
Bee
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Nov 30 2005, 09:39 PM)
Mulva? As in rhymes with a female body part?
[right][snapback]158014[/snapback][/right]


Is his middle name Dolores? blink.gif
davisął
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Nov 30 2005, 08:37 PM)
Makes me willing to spend some money. I always kinda liked ED, the new blond on the weekends is ok too.
[right][snapback]158012[/snapback][/right]



You like a blond named Ed?

(not that there's anything wrong with that)

I did think that photo of you in the hat was cute. laugh.gif laugh.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.