Thank goodness someone is here to quantify things for me.

I noticed there seems to be some disconnect as to things like common sense....like not understanding the difference between a religious leader casting aspersion over an entire society or race of people and average joe citizen calling a liar a liar.

Save the pity party for someone who needs it. Coulter plays half as tough as Hillary. None of here enemies turn up dead.

Proof?

I thought not---

You see, Coulter's venomous tongue is verifiable.

Your opinion is not.

More of that disconnect thing I just mentioned, Bee....

It's more than a disconnect, Bix, my man. It's an alternate universe. Just like the Islamists have theirs. It's nothing new. Sandburg wrote all about Bunkshooters, greed, and corruption.

Reality and truth win out always.

It's just frustrating sometimes when people are soooo willfully ignorant.

Their arrogance and hubris, not to mention their INCOMPETENCE, gives them away.

Everytime.

No tyrants ever suceed, for long.




Like the kitty-cat thing?

Yes, li'l Bee....just like that...

You know--that thing about tyrants you said---someone else said something very similar once:

Try to comprehend the difference between being personally offended & commenting on someone's behaviour being offensive---

Or is that a:

If you all Godless lefty bastiges have so much problems and fear of religion, then why don't you just stay the fark away?

There's no proof anything bad happened to Hoffa either.

Fear? It is your ilk that fear, everything. Change, diffrent people, different nations, different lifestyles.... the list of what you 'fear" is endless and pathetic.

What most reasonable folk feel about you and your yellow-bellied ilk is disgust, at how you denigrate religion. In the name of petty politics and all that is ugly.

People like you put the word "God" on money. How filthy is THAT?

There's a reason you did that, and a reason your excesses eventually are your downfall.

Bunkshooter.




So far there's no proof that you have one original thought. Try just ONCE disagreeing with your party.

Try it.

I could disagree with them 49% of the time, and still not ever vote for the radical left-wing loons in the democrat party.

How'z about YOU disagree with your party first?

I do.

Frequently.

I've gotten into contentous discussions with every "leftie" on this board.

Contentious, as opposed to brainless. I have a lot of respect for honest debate and none for parroting wankers that drone the same tripe anyone could get by checking out NewsMax, which I get every morning.

I've yet to see you bandwagoneers EVER disagree.

You're sheep.

remember when Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 was gospel truth for the lefty's in early 2004?

Now they piss and moan about ann coulter.........

H

O

W

L

Far too much has been made of both Coulter and Moore. Neither is worth the time or efort.

CHOPS, THE LIBS CANT DEAL WITH ANYTHING ELSE FROM COULTER, HER BOOK IS DEAD ON WHEN IT COMES TO THE GODLESS LIBERAL CHURCH. THEY LIKE TO USE THE WITCHES OF BRUNSWICK PITY PARTY AS A DISTRACTION FROM THE TRUE GUTS OF HER BOOK. WHICH IS DEAD ON!

WAIL!

I don't see the Jersey Girls efforts as a pity party. They have been advocating a full adoption of the 9-11 report recommendations, as far as I can tell.

they would be poster children for the repuslickans if they kissed as much bush ass as coultler.

\
Theyv been blaming bush for 9/11 and campaigning for kerry making speeches. when you enter politics you are fair game. Including coulter.

What "Liberal Church?' Is that in the yellow pages? Part of the Council of Churches? There just is no such thing.

If you want to rant about imaginary figments of a hate-mongers latest hate-speech, say buh-bye to your credibility.

Really JT, 9/11 is real. The widows really did have to tell their kids their dads weren't coming home. Coulter is making a joke out of you and anyone that defends her

That isn't funny. It's rather sad.

The "joke," if there is one, is on you.



They didn't spare Clinton. If they were partisan they would have.

What is it about farkoff that you don't understand?

JAFZ

Keep it up. Democrats will just love making TalibAnn the "poster child" of Republican morals and values.

Is it fun digging your own grave, politically? It appears to be pretty hard work, sympathizing with one so very hateful, and so universally denounced for the heartless and hypocritical comments.



Zealot! Go forth and marginalize thyself!

"...Is it fun digging your own grave, politically? It appears to be pretty hard work, sympathizing with one so very hateful, and so universally denounced for the heartless and hypocritical comments.



Zealot! Go forth and marginalize thyself! ..."

Rubber; glue; Bee's wax.

'twas a funny, sonny boy.

Mind that first step on the bandwagon, there.

Queer loving cock gobbling Godless lefty mother farkers.

Repeating a lie, even a stupid, hateful lie, doesn't make it any more truthful.


































It does make the pathetic old fart that repeats it ad nauseum look like a moron, though

Don't tell Barto how to practice his religion.





This about sums it up for this phony.









Straight from the gospel o' barto.


Amen.


A good example of Republican morals and values. Kill any of those godless vermin there, Christ-boy? Or did you turn the other cheek as commanded?

I am not toally excusing it. I'm pointing out that the blame game isn't one sided when the ladies are used as political bombers and suffer some shrapnel wounds themselves. It's so easy for Liberals to set the stage rules of engegment to give them the advantage and scream bloody murder when one uses their own rules and tactics back at em.

Witness, or pester?

I've got nothing against church groups doing charity, but they can have their own criteria, and I believe there should be a floor that doesn't exclude anyone based on religious grounds. If the church decides you're a "sinner", they might just cut you off, or if they decide they want you to have more babies, they may decide you can't have condoms. (or they may want you to have NO babies and sterilize you)

This is insane. Don't you righties realize it's YOU that Coulter is satirizing? That YOU, not lefties, are the ones she's mocking?

Here's the poster girl for liberal enlightened tolerance giving a few more of her superior moral evaluation of people with opposing or differing views. Take note folks. This is how we should all interact in society if we don't toe the dictates of the liberal line. They can rant and blast you but if you blast back you’re the ignorant rant.

This pompousness is then allegedly supported by a delusional sense of proof in the number of opinions posted, ie: 14,300 which entitles someone, who is a legend in their own mind, to dismiss any possible or plausible counterview or counterpoint. This forum is filled with examples after examples of these hypocrisies as practiced in the congress and real world as well.

Is it then no wonder that they cry that so few in this country listen to their genteel approach to expressing their counterpoints.




Another twist. It's a statement that includes the word GOD. "In GOD we trust." There is a reason you want it and it's Judeo/Christiian morality out of government and a reason that will eventually lead to all our downfall.

You must be doing pretty well if they feel the need to respond. We were all noobs somewhere at some time. It doesn't last long.

You know, I wish rightwingers would take this attitude and assail Bush for ruthlessly using 9/11 as his campaign background even after he said, "Of course, no one should use it". Now they attack anyone who accuses him of it. Who uses 9/11 as an answer or excuse for every illegal, unconstitutional over-reach by this president, congress or the new conservative court?

Talk about some real hypocrisy. Those women lost their husbands and had to fight tooth and nail for that forkhead Bush to even have a 9-11 commission. Of course rightwingers hate them for that, and will stoop to any swiftboating level of politics to destroy them. It just reminds rightwingers of the INCONVENIENT fact of how much Bush stonewalled the whole idea of a 9/11 commission. Of course the widdows are angry with him. He was the #1 opponent of ANY investigation. And, ironically, he and his party are the main benificiaries of the milking and manipulating of 9/11 for purely political purposes. As I've said before, anyone willing to use 9/11 as a political tool to elevate their party to political and financial domination can NEVER be trusted again. And anyone who excuses that kind of deceitful, divisive behavior has lost any moral high ground they may have had.

Bottom line, the use of 9/11 as a media/coup tool by Republicans is the lowest act I've ever seen, deserving of scorn and disgust, certainly not admiration.

Or Al Franken's books.


But the same is okay by the liberals? The swift boat use of the 9/11 widows?

Yeah. Right. As far as this religious reference? I don't want a Christian government. I don't want any religion elevated to any kind of official level. Period.

Oh really?

The same tactics, eh?

Got any sources that have Democrats saying the 9/11 widows are glad their husbands got burned alive when the towers were hit?

How about a Democrat advocating murdering a Supreme Court Justice?

Oh give it up.

I'm hardly "moralizing."

That would be "TalibAnn" the author of "godless." How silly of you. Getting huffy because of the very understandablle outrage over the Republican zealot led defamation of Religion and political discourse has achieved yet another new low? Cry me a river and clean out your own house.

You can claim it's in "response to Liberal baiting," but no liberal has gone that far. Period. Pointing out TalibAnn's obvious hypocrisy and shameful behavior isn't moralizing, brainless bleater.

It amazes me to see how far you zealots go to defend the indefensible.

See FriendJudy's comment. It's an observation being made by conservatives everywhere. Where have you been?

If you want to be part of the lunatic fringe, that's fine, just don't expect anything but ridicule and deserved scorn from the rational majority.



The pompous asses are folks that believe a clown like TalibAn and defend her from an outraged society. Unlike the fringers, most people understand the difference between parisan opinion and actual values.

You are showing your lack of them right now, by the way.




In the meantime, I'm happy to let his true "personality" bleat it's way onto the bandwagon.

No, they were busy saying the President planned 9-11 to murder thousands, Rove should be executed and GW "shot between the eyes".

Maybe everyone should tone it down a little bit so issues can be discussed without so much vitriol.

And, to boot, as Lordship keeps reminding us, getting you to PAY her to do it. She's laughing all the way to the bank.

If one has to ride on a bandwagon, why should they ride on yours instead? So far I don't see much salesmanship.

Coulter is just lowering the bar so rightwingers can do whatever the fork it takes to win the next election no matter how disgusting. There is no limit to the level of disgusting behavior from the morals and values crowd. It's become a joke. Pretty meaningless actually. Like faith-based. It's all a media event for the benefit of the party.



All hail the party.


Or else.

Oh, come on, davis. Like Limbaugh, Coulter long since ceased to even take herself seriously, much less her fans. They both drip with contempt for their loyal followers.

For Rush, I can at least say that most of his audience is in on the joke and (LP and a few dimwits excepted) know and enjoy the joke. Something like the way SNL, in its better years, was both sincerely meant social commentary, and a satire of the PC left. I don't know what it is with Coulter fans that they're so slow to pick up on the joke.

Except Big Bart. From his repeated posting of that hilarious photo of Ann making fun of herself, half-nekked with a gun, I'm pretty sure he gets the joke.

But you and Biz and Bee need to catch on to the joke, too, and quit taking her seriously. She quit taking HERSELF seriously about the time FoxNews fired her.

"My" bandwagon? Oh sure. If having a normal reaction to TalibAnns depravity is "my bandwagon," it hardly needs to be "sold."

The abnormal reaction is, once again, blaming "democrats" for their own folly, and excusing absolutely repulsive behavior.

Let's not forget that she says Max Cleland was lucky to have 3 of his limbs blown off by a grenade....

Yeah---Spot---it's time to tone it down when exposing Coulter for being the heartless witch that she is...we can't have that happening..better tone it down now.

BullSh*t!

I suppose it shouldn't bother me--those that want to identify with her and support her "message" should be allowed to do so unimpeded.

As far as Bush, Cheney et. al. go, oh yeah--the whole lot of'm should be charged with high treason...and then they should receive the appropriate punishment.

She's a lightning rod. She can draw all the criticisms and make even the most radical rightwing extremist congressman look mild by comparison. That way they can spew what they want and it doesn't matter.

Lefties blame everything on righties, think everything right of Che is a Nazi, and truly believe the Republican party is Satan's Own Party. Sorry, but I think Dems and lefties need to worry about their own repulsive behavior, not just revel in the fact it rarely makes the MSM.

It's not funny---jokes are supposed to be funny. It's vile and repugnant.

WTF? Lots of "democrats" were saying that? Are you nuts?

Sources? I never heard even Cynthia McKinney say the President "planned" 9/11. The guy that said Bush should be "shot between the eyes" apologized and admitted it was the wrong thing to say within hours. He certainly didn't blame "Republicans" for his poor judgement.

I'm tired of giving these outspoken jerks "do-overs." If they want to say indefensible things, they can take the responsibility for them. Blaming others is the Republican M.O. Another one of those "Republican Values."

Coulter is the perfect "poster critter" for that sort of nonsense.

Great quote Davis..............

Now if we can just get you to use that when it comes to what world opinion is toward American Leadership after 9/11 youll be fine.

Who cares what the socialist world thinks?




Republicans may blame others, liberals blame America First.