Btw, by all means "be proud to be White". Nothing wrong with that, per se.

Arkansas cop uses Taser on 10-year-old girl
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/arkansas-cop-t...10yearold-girl/

Cop Went Wild With Taser, Diabetic Says



Things Police can taser you for now includes: being unresponsive due to coma.

Seems to me if the police lose the suit it proves it isn't something they can taser you for.

is that what it takes to decide?

33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/3...on-should-know/

The Amazing Kreskin was able to predict the time twice a day ... as was Jean Dixon.

Funny, all the conspiracies in the world and not one single one from the left. The USSR, China, Cuba etc have been hatching plots for decades and not one is worth mentioning.

nice dodge

How The Machine Creates Obedient Zombies

Media contrived “monkey see, monkey do” hive mentality leads Stepford Wives to cheerlead for their own enslavement

http://www.prisonplanet.com/how-the-machin...nt-zombies.html

Police fight cellphone recordings

Witnesses taking audio of officers arrested, charged with illegal surveillance



Boston police would like to remind everybody that it is a felony to use your cell phone to record them roughing up a suspect.

Or maybe they don't enjoy additional interference while they are doing their jobs...

(shakes head)

"Calling it your job don't make it right"

Cool Hand Luke

If "interference" merely means reporting abuse, then you're probably on to something.

I doubt you would enjoy someone coming to your workstation and begin recording your activities...how do you think the average officer feels when his exposure to distraction is far riskier than yours?

straw dog

No, no they don't.

Everything I do is recorded. Everything. And if I were beating people in my cubicle, uh, yeah, recording is in order. Duh.

Not the same thing...police are often recorded by their own cameras.

I was referring to some stranger, an outsider, someone posing a distraction for reasons undetermined...Duh, indeed.

no witnesses

Easily Hacked Diebold Systems to Decide 'Toss-Up' U.S. Senate Special Election in MA on Tuesday

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/49300

Time for some preemptive stink when it looks like Coakley may lose.

time to dump the machines

way past time

they've been hacked live on the news

give us a break already

if I programmed them and hid the source code would you want to use them?

You use Microsoft products without access to the source code...

Move the election to Chicago ...

Most of the cheating is done by humans with absentee ballots.

not at all

do some research on Ohio '04

so you would have no problem with my machines counting the vote

Your're not working for Cheney are you?

who would admit it if they were?

What makes you think your machines would actually work?

as well as the usual ones don't

Do some research on Washington State.

sounds like doublespeak to me

Anything that doesn't benefit Dems does.

Ohio tipped it for bushie, barely

you won't touch it and it shows

Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted - enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/104...election_stolen

It's been touched. Unfortunately nothing gets fixed because Dems only care if they lose. They don't even bother to wait until elections to start complaining about why they lost. Set up the accusations first, then look for anything they can later.

Meanwhile more people are voting for Hillary than are eligible. SOP.

you won't touch it

the reps cheated so bushie won

So it's only a problem if Reps win?

only when they cheat to win

it takes huge crowds like Obama had to insure no cheating

you can't delete or ignore the mob

But Dems get to cheat. Seems fair enough....

dems have to have a mob so the cheating from the reps is obvious and won't work

if its close diebold picks up the slack

That's why I own a shotgun. Y'all stand close together now, ya'hear?

you'll go down shootin'

The Diebold electronic voting machines to be used in more than 90% of the state's districts are the same demonstrably unreliable ballot scanning systems that were seen being hacked in the Emmy-nominated HBO documentary Hacking Democracy. The rest of the machines used in the Bay State are made by Sequoia Voting System, Inc., the same manufacturer whose machines were "misconfigured," to switch votes in Erie County, NY's Nov. 3, 2009 election and which have failed, and even been hacked, in a number of cases around the country.

Making matters worse, the company who sells, services and programs the Diebold optical-scan paper ballot systems to be used next week, LHS Associates, has a disturbing criminal background, and has admitted to tampering illegally with voting systems during past elections.


Easily Hacked Voting Systems to be Used in MA Special Election for the U.S. Senate
http://www.gouverneurtimes.com/st-lawrence...-us-senate.html

the Brown Shirts are here in The Marx in an attempt to force Cookley to win via iron-fisted intimidation.

The Revolutionaries are fighting back.

So why should we trust these people again?


FBI got 2,000 phone records with fake terrorism emergencies: report

The FBI illegally collected 2,000 phone records between 2002 and 2006 invoking nonexistent terrorism emergencies, according to a report in The Washington Post.


Later this month, the Justice Department is expected to issue a report that will find the FBI violated regulations many times with its terrorism-related phone record requests. FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III did not know about the problems until late 2006 or early 2007 when they were brought to light by an inspector general investigation, reports the Associated Press.

The memos do not reveal whose phone records were collected by the FBI, but Bureau officials say that nearly all instances were related to terrorism cases. They added that agents were working under the stress of trying to stop potential terror attacks and did not intentionally violate the law.

The FBI, which previously admitted to illegally collecting phone records in 2007, has begun to publicly acknowledge this latest phone record collection abuse. In an interview with The Washington Post, Valerie Caproni, general counsel for the FBI, said that the bureau had violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act in collecting the 2,000 phone records in question.

"We should have stopped those requests from being made that way," she said. The after-the-fact approvals were a "good-hearted but not well-thought-out" solution to put phone carriers at ease, she said. In true emergencies, Caproni said, agents always had the legal right to get phone records, and lawyers have now concluded there was no need for the after-the-fact approval process. "What this turned out to be was a self-inflicted wound," she said.

The FBI never obtained the content of telephone conversations through the program. Additionally, the Bureau has already taken steps to ensure that nothing similar will happen again, FBI spokesman Michael Kortan told Reuters. He added that no one in the FBI had used these methods to for “reasons other than a legitimate investigative interest.”

Previously, FBI agents required a grand jury subpoena or a “national security letter” related to a terrorism or espionage case to collect phone records. However, after Sept. 11, the Patriot Act loosened the restrictions required to obtain phone records. Lower-level FBI officials were given the authority to request phone records, but the Press Trust of India reports that the program soon expanded beyond the intent of the loosened restrictions with phone records possibly unrelated to terrorism cases being collected by the FBI.

Main Justice, a news agency devoted to covering the Department of Justice, reports that although this is not the first time the FBI’s improper collection of phone records has come to light, the e-mails and memos collected by The Post reveal the internal controversy behind the program.




http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-s...rgencies-report

Jefferson Memorial Dance Suit Dismissed



For the Gods sakes don't dance to the music on your Ipod at the Jefferson Memorial. You will so go to jail.

What a stupid charge....