Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Environment
C-Span sucks community > politics > Political Soapbox
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87
gtessex
QUOTE(Bee @ Jan 3 2006, 02:40 PM)
That would be "vernal pools" and yes, they are very important environmentally. They tend to get built over, so their status has become more important in recent years.

If someone inspects the are in the fall, they might not know they're there.

If you're interested...

http://www.vernalpool.org/vernal_1.htm
[right][snapback]170875[/snapback][/right]


Well............I learn something new everyday. Thought I knew of all the 'critters'
that lived around my area. Never figgered we had......SHRIMP! ohmy.gif

QUOTE
Fairy Shrimp Distribution in New England
Fairy shrimp are found only in vernal pools. You often can see them swimming "upside down" in the water as soon as the ice is thawed. They can be quite abundant for a couple of months and then gone by June. Not every vernal pool has fairy shrimp and pools which do have fairy shrimp do not always have them every year.

user posted image
http://www.vernalpool.org/ed-fs-01.htm

I love Shrimp....but I'd hate to peel these things blink.gif I bet it would take a few thousand of them to fill me up! laugh.gif

I could picture 3/4 of the state having these so-called vernal pools laying around. The only thing I remember as a nature loving kid is mosquito larvae swimming around in these pools and I sure in hell don't ever want those things protected! biggrin.gif


Bee
QUOTE(gtessex @ Jan 3 2006, 02:42 PM)
Well............I learn something new everyday. Thought I knew of all the 'critters'
that lived around my area. Never figgered we had......SHRIMP!  ohmy.gif
user posted image
http://www.vernalpool.org/ed-fs-01.htm

I love Shrimp....but I'd hate to peel these things  blink.gif I bet it would take a few thousand of them to fill me up!  laugh.gif

I could picture 3/4 of the state having these so-called vernal pools laying around. The only thing I remember as a nature loving kid is mosquito larvae swimming around in these pools and I sure in hell don't ever want those things protected!  biggrin.gif
[right][snapback]170894[/snapback][/right]


smile.gif Well it's part of the chain, they've gotten rather rabid about protecting them as so many have been built over.

I did some gratis work for Manomet Center for Conservation Science in Massachusetts. It was an Atlas, and one of the pages maps all the remaining vernal pools in Southern Massachusetts. That same year a science teacher at our Middle School "saved" a vernal pool that almost got a road built through it, the town didn't know it was there, but she'd been bringing classes to study it every spring for years.

They're nurseries really.
Bart Katz
Vernal pools is where evolution happens. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
Bee
Showing off your ignorance Bart?

I'll be sure to quote that post whenever you start lying again.
Bart Katz
It's like magic. You get some dried grass or hay and put it in some water and let it sit around a few days. Then you take out some of the water and put it under a microscope. Wonder of wonders there are tiny one celled animals in that water.
Bee
Bart the biologist

Bart the scientist

Bart the liar
Bart Katz
Bee, "never had an original thought", Hive.
Bee
Bart the liar

Bart the judge

Bart the dittohead
lil bart
QUOTE(Bart Katz @ Jan 3 2006, 01:11 PM)
Vernal pools is where evolution happens.  laugh.gif  laugh.gif  laugh.gif
[right][snapback]170909[/snapback][/right]


Those were some whacky lookin' tadpoles. blink.gif
lil bart
QUOTE(gtessex @ Jan 3 2006, 10:58 AM)
I may never complain about my $15,000 poopy system again after reading this!  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pb...306/1007&theme=

We love our Muskrats here in Vermont!  wacko.gif
[right][snapback]170836[/snapback][/right]


user posted image

Actually, Willis Alan Ramsey wrote that song. Cap'n 'n Tennille just butchered it.

In Washington state, wetlands are regularly filled with landfill for industrial sitings. Most recently where I am living now, this was done for a WalMart Super Center and for a Home Depot.

Then the water runs elsewhere and floods old houses built in historical districts.

That's how governments do bidness with bidness .... here.
davisął
QUOTE(lil bart @ Jan 3 2006, 03:51 PM)
user posted image

Actually, Willis Alan Ramsey wrote that song. Cap'n 'n Tennille just butchered it.


[right][snapback]170970[/snapback][/right]


America did it. I deleted it from my backup copy of their greatest hits.

user posted image




Carol
Big freeze leaves trail of deaths across Asia

ISABEL REYNOLDS


INDIA'S capital New Delhi recorded its lowest temperature for 70 years yesterday as unusually cold weather continued to cause havoc across Asia.

In Japan, where at least 63 people have died and more than 1,000 have been injured since heavy snowfalls began last month, troops and volunteers shovelled snow from roofs and roads, while in China's Xinjiang province cattle were dying in the fields in temperatures of -43C and a 25-mile section of the Yellow River froze.


In Bangladesh, at least 20 people have died from exposure, disease and malnutrition over the past three days because of a cold snap there.

In India, residents of the capital awoke yesterday to a temperature around freezing point, forcing officials to shut primary schools for three days. TV footage showed a layer of ice on the grass in parks and on the roofs of cars.

...And further north, Indian Kashmir continued to shiver as overnight temperatures dipped to -6C.

"It is terribly cold. I feel like we are living in a refrigerator," said 34-year-old housewife Rubina Malik.

For the first time in ten years, parts of the famous Dal lake in the regional capital Srinagar were frozen. Authorities banned skating on the lake after a child drowned when the thin ice cracked.

More than 100 people have died in northern India since December because of the cold. The coldest recorded temperature in New Delhi is -0.6C (30.92F) in 1935.

In Japan workers were trying to clear snow which was up to ten feet deep in some of the worst-hit areas of Niigata prefecture, and to reopen blocked roads in Nagano prefecture.

Many of the dead there were elderly people who fell from their roofs while trying to clear snow, while others were crushed when their houses collapsed under the weight of the drifts.

"It's frightening," said a woman in Akita City, in northern Japan, as local government workers began to shovel snow from her roof.

"There were creaking sounds and I couldn't open the doors because of the weight of snow."

China is in the middle of its coldest winter in 20 years, the China Daily newspaper said. Even in the usually mild province of Guangdong in the south, temperatures dipped as low as 5C on Friday while some local roads have frozen over with more than an inch of ice.

In Xinjiang, where heavy snowfalls and temperatures as low as -43C forced the evacuation of almost 100,000 people earlier in the week, conditions remained testing.

In the province's northern Altay region, temperatures were hovering around -26C after falling to 37C and killing cattle over the past few days, said an official from the local meteorological bureau.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/internatio...cfm?id=34712006
Bart Katz
We must think about the chilluns.
judy
New source of global warming gas found

LONDON (Reuters) - German scientists have discovered a new source of methane, a greenhouse gas that is second only to carbon dioxide in its impact on climate change.
    QUOTE
    The culprits are plants. laugh.gif biggrin.gif smile.gif

They produce about 10 to 30 percent of the annual methane found in the atmosphere, according to researchers at the Max-Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany.

The scientists measured the amount of methane released by plants in controlled experiments. They found it increases with rising temperatures and exposure to sunlight.

"Significant methane emissions from both intact plants and detached leaves were observed ... in the laboratory and in the field," Dr Frank Keppler and his team said in a report in the journal Nature.

Methane, which is produced by city rubbish dumps, coal mining, flatulent animals, rice cultivation and peat bogs, is one of the most potent greenhouse gases in terms of its ability to trap heat.

Concentrations of the gas in the atmosphere have almost tripled in the last 150 years. About 600 million tonnes worldwide are produced annually.

The scientists said their finding is important for understanding the link between global warming and a rise in greenhouse gases.

It could also have implications for the Kyoto Protocol, which calls for developed countries to cut their emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12.

Keppler and his colleagues discovered that living plants emit 10 to 100 times more methane than dead plants.

Scientists had previously thought that plants could only emit methane in the absence of oxygen.

David Lowe, of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research in New Zealand, said the findings are startling and controversial.

"Keppler and colleagues' finding helps to account for observations from space of incredibly large plumes of methane above tropical forests," he said in a commentary on the research.

But the study also poses questions, such as how such a potentially large source of methane could have been overlooked and how plants produced it.

"There will be a lively scramble among researchers for the answers to these and other questions," Lowe added.


Article- Click Here

DUH? ohmy.gif
Tom Servo
How did plants learn how to drive Chevy Suburbans?
Spot
I've heard of GE plants, but GM?
oda
QUOTE(Spot @ Jan 15 2006, 10:46 PM) [snapback]176510[/snapback]

I've heard of GE plants, but GM?

Seems WV is building a liquifing coal plant, first i know of in US, maybe world, liquify coal into gas, oil. Would be great i think.
gtessex
Enviromentists fighting each other over....windpower!

Interesting article...but also reinforces my opinion that we will NEVER reduce our dependence on foreign oil because of these idiots! mad.gif

QUOTE
A wind-powered water fight continues to intensify among rich and famous Northeasterners. The New England social elite consistently advocates industrial wind farms everywhere in the country except in their own backyard, and they are fighting intensely against a proposed wind farm in Nantucket Sound off the coast of Martha's Vineyard.

The proposed wind farm is sparking a civil war among professed environmentalists, taking center stage in a debate encompassing everything from fossil fuels to migratory birds to the aesthetic beauty of famously pristine seashores.


QUOTE
Police Separate Kennedy, Activists

While the Romney letter is the latest salvo regarding the contentious issue, it is far from the most dramatic.

In what the August 21 issue of the New Bedford Standard Times called "a strange battle of boats," environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy hosted an anti-wind farm cruise in mid-August in Nantucket Sound. Arguing the proposed wind farm would be too environmentally damaging, Kennedy drew the ire of pro-wind environmental activist groups Greenpeace and Clean Power Now.

QUOTE
Supporting Kennedy, Walter Cronkite, the Nantucket-retired TV news anchor, told a reporter, "The problem really is Not in My Backyardism, and it bothers me a great deal that I find myself in this position. I'm all for these [windmills] but there must be areas that are far less valuable than this place."

As an example of a "less valuable" place, Cronkite suggested inland New England. Industrial wind farms have been proposed in places such as Vermont's White Mountains, but local residents there vehemently oppose giant wind turbines blighting the area's beautiful ridge tops.



According to the August 18 Cape Cod Today, a Clean Power Now protestor shouted, "Hey, Bobby, you're on the wrong boat!" Police had to keep the two boats apart after Kennedy challenged the Clean Power Now protestors to "Come over here and listen to what I am saying!"


QUOTE
On the other side of the issue, a New Bedford Standard Times house editorial criticized Kennedy's theatrics. "Robert Kennedy, once considered an environmental lawyer with principal [sic], has sold out to the well-heeled 'Not in My Back Yard' version of environmentalism, which is really not environmentalism at all," wrote the Times.

"Robert Kennedy sided with the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, funded by wealthy property owners who don't want to look at wind turbines," the Times added. "Robert Kennedy has squandered his reputation as a real environmentalist to prevent any change to his own back yard."

"It is rather ironic to see self-proclaimed environmental activists bickering with each other about wind power," observed Lieberman. "This just goes to show that no person, group, or activist viewpoint can claim an exclusive title of being 'environmentalist.'"

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=18240

We need to continue to 'fight' over developing....ANY energy resource within this country's borders and just keep importing it from the Mid-East. Of course, I wonder if any of these baffoons have ever gave it a thought of what might happen if the supply of Oil that comes from the Mid-East somehow gets disrupted.
I know....I for one am seeing 'storm clouds' building up in the horizon due to the Iran thingy...but maybe we should ignore it and hope it all goes away! sad.gif


judy
PROTECT YOUR FAMILY.

FIND SEX OFFENDERS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD


Try this now....

Type in your home address or a family members' address. The web site will bring up a map of your neighborhood with small colored boxes on it. The small House icon represents your address; the colored boxes represent sex offenders in your area.

Click on the colored boxes and it will bring up the offender's photograph and the exact address, names and employers. Click ALL AROUND, you will be amazed at the information you get!

Click Here
gtessex
QUOTE(judy @ Jan 17 2006, 07:49 AM) [snapback]177130[/snapback]

PROTECT YOUR FAMILY.

FIND SEX OFFENDERS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD


Try this now....

Type in your home address or a family members' address. The web site will bring up a map of your neighborhood with small colored boxes on it. The small House icon represents your address; the colored boxes represent sex offenders in your area.

Click on the colored boxes and it will bring up the offender's photograph and the exact address, names and employers. Click ALL AROUND, you will be amazed at the information you get!

Click Here


Judy,

This subject is off topic, but I just wanna add my two cents.

This is a great idea for worst case sex offenders..but it's getting out of control when they are pushing
to add everyone who has been convicted of any sex crime be added to the sex offender registry and posted on sites such as this.

For example. The state of Vermont actively (because it's a law) goes after casual sex between teenagers. A 16 year old boy can get nailed to the wall for having sexual contact with a 15 year old girl. If convicted, the teen gets to go through sex offender treatment, put on probation and after successfully completing treatment still remains on the sex offender registry for another 10 years.

I certainly oppose having these type of people plastered on these kinda sites and labeled the same as a serial rapist. Kids make mistakes, but they could have their lives ruined if their mugs show up in national sex offender databases.

The state of Vermont currently only let's the public see class 3 (I believe) sex offenders and I noticed that Vermont can't be accessed from this site. But....Vermont is considering making all sex offenders available for public access....something I strongly disagree with. JMHO!
davisął
Food for thought.
judy
QUOTE(gtessex @ Jan 17 2006, 08:18 AM) [snapback]177142[/snapback]

Judy,

This subject is off topic, but I just wanna add my two cents.

This is a great idea for worst case sex offenders..but it's getting out of control when they are pushing
to add everyone who has been convicted of any sex crime be added to the sex offender registry and posted on sites such as this.

For example. The state of Vermont actively (because it's a law) goes after casual sex between teenagers. A 16 year old boy can get nailed to the wall for having sexual contact with a 15 year old girl. If convicted, the teen gets to go through sex offender treatment, put on probation and after successfully completing treatment still remains on the sex offender registry for another 10 years.

I certainly oppose having these type of people plastered on these kinda sites and labeled the same as a serial rapist. Kids make mistakes, but they could have their lives ruined if their mugs show up in national sex offender databases.

The state of Vermont currently only let's the public see class 3 (I believe) sex offenders and I noticed that Vermont can't be accessed from this site. But....Vermont is considering making all sex offenders available for public access....something I strongly disagree with. JMHO!


I didn't know where to put it.

The Environment
What about the cheeeeldren?


It really didn't fit anywhere.

I agree with you that young teen age couples shouldn't be classiffied with the hard cord sex offenders. However, where I am now, there have been several nationally told stories about little girls being abducted and killed by sex offenders who belonged in jail and were roaming around free.
gtessex
QUOTE(judy @ Jan 17 2006, 03:21 PM) [snapback]177244[/snapback]

I didn't know where to put it.

The Environment
What about the cheeeeldren?


It really didn't fit anywhere.

I agree with you that young teen age couples shouldn't be classiffied with the hard cord sex offenders. However, where I am now, there have been several nationally told stories about little girls being abducted and killed by sex offenders who belonged in jail and were roaming around free.


I could agree that some of these 'sex offenders' should be locked up & toss away the key. My issue is with the sex offender registry itself. IMHO, only the hardcore or those who are more likely to re-offend should be in that database.

Society today basically lumps all sex offenders into one catagory...from the serial rapist right down to a 16 year old who has sexual contact with a 14 year old. I don't wanna ruin some kid's life because he made a bad choice in a sexual encounter and/or wasn't even aware that such strict laws are on the books and then has to deal with the issue if someone finds that individual's name and address on the sex offender registry.

I also have an issue with the link you posted. I pulled up a couple of areas....and the information on these characters are too vague. In some cases, what the individual was convicted of....was left....BLANK!

To my way of thinking....that is totally unexceptable. If they're going to put these individuals out there for people to see, then they best put into detail what it is that those people did to earn them the right to become...famous! Only then could I determine if that individual could possibly be a threat to children and others!


Bart Katz
QUOTE(gtessex @ Jan 17 2006, 03:34 PM) [snapback]177260[/snapback]

I could agree that some of these 'sex offenders' should be locked up & toss away the key. My issue is with the sex offender registry itself. IMHO, only the hardcore or those who are more likely to re-offend should be in that database.

Society today basically lumps all sex offenders into one catagory...from the serial rapist right down to a 16 year old who has sexual contact with a 14 year old. I don't wanna ruin some kid's life because he made a bad choice in a sexual encounter and/or wasn't even aware that such strict laws are on the books and then has to deal with the issue if someone finds that individual's name and address on the sex offender registry.

I also have an issue with the link you posted. I pulled up a couple of areas....and the information on these characters are too vague. In some cases, what the individual was convicted of....was left....BLANK!

To my way of thinking....that is totally unexceptable. If they're going to put these individuals out there for people to see, then they best put into detail what it is that those people did to earn them the right to become...famous! Only then could I determine if that individual could possibly be a threat to children and others!



Are there really lots of teens that get prosecuted for this?
judy
QUOTE(Bart Katz @ Jan 17 2006, 04:41 PM) [snapback]177271[/snapback]

Are there really lots of teens that get prosecuted for this?



Is a 14 year old looking at sexual images of other under age teenagers the same as a 40 year old doing it?
Click Here
davisął
Exxon Valdez Judgment Dispute Back in Court

By DAVID KRAVETS
The Associated Press
Friday, January 27, 2006; 8:31 AM

SAN FRANCISCO -- It's been nearly 17 years since the Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil along the Alaska coast in one of the country's worst environmental disasters, and a jury's $5 billion judgment against the company is still tied up in the courts.

Exxon Mobil Corp.'s appeal of that punishment was scheduled to be heard for the third time Friday in a federal appeals court in San Francisco.


The case stems from a 1994 decision by an Anchorage jury to award punitive damages to 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans.

The residents claimed they were harmed when the Valdez struck a charted reef and spilled crude oil along about 1,500 miles of coastline. They alleged that the captain was drunk and that Exxon knew he had a drinking problem. The jury found Exxon and Valdez captain Joseph Hazelwood reckless in the accident.

Exxon argues it should have to pay no more than $25 million in punitive damages.

The corporation, which reported third-quarter earnings of $10 billion, says it has spent more than $3 billion to settle federal and state lawsuits and to clean the Prince William Sound area.

In two previous appeals, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered U.S. District Judge H. Russel Holland of Anchorage to reduce the judgment against Exxon, saying it was unconstitutionally excessive.

Holland begrudgingly complied in 2002, reducing it to $4 billion. Irving, Texas-based Exxon appealed, and Holland was ordered to revisit the decision again. He called Exxon's actions "reprehensible," and set the figure at $4.5 billion plus interest.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6012700454.html

QUOTE
Is a 14 year old looking at sexual images of other under age teenagers the same as a 40 year old doing it?


Hey! Do you have to innondate every god damned thread with this bs? I know it's the new devisive gay marriage tactic for Republicans for the upcoming election but this is getting ridiculous. I don't follow the on subject thing too close myself and I like it that way. But to post this sexual predator/crime crap in all the threads is hogwash.

Create a thread.
gtessex
QUOTE(Bart Katz @ Jan 17 2006, 04:41 PM) [snapback]177271[/snapback]

Are there really lots of teens that get prosecuted for this?


Unfortunately....Yes! sad.gif

I know alittle bit about this subject since a guy I went to highschool with is now a bigtime lawyer in Burlington who defends individuals in these types of cases.

The laws in Vermont are extremely strict in sexual abuse cases. The lawyer put the law into this perspective. "if a 15 year old girl stripped in front of a 16 year old boy, the boy 'could' be charged either
with 'prohibitive acts' or L&L".
Of course it's left up to the prosecuter if they choose to prosecute or not. The problem with going after young teens is...there is no way to determine if these kids are true 'sex offenders', or just a kid going through adolescence.

It should also be pointed out that 'sex crimes' are not limited to those 16 years old and above, but also to kids younger than teenagers. This state is 'gung-ho' on sex offender treatment especially group therapy sessions and have countless social workers, shrinks, and psychologists within the system that need to keep 'busy', thus the state goes out of it's way to make sure that all of these 'specialists' have a 'continuous flow' of new 'customers' to keep them 'busy and employed'.

Another issue that my lawyer friend pointed out...is that these 'sexual offender treatment programs' are set up for the individual to fail. Often times they will 'wash certain kids' out of the program if the 'specialist' feels that they aren't living up to the 'rules' of the 'program'. Thus a kid could then end up with a criminal record based on nothing more than 'inappropriate sexual contact' committed while he was a teenager. Then that individual also ends up on the sex offender registry.

This all from the same state that just handed out a 60 day jail sentence (amended to 3-10 years) to a adult who has been raping a 6 year old girl for 4 years. As much as I blasted Judge Cashman for his decision, I understand that perhaps he was trying to send a message how screwed up the Vermont system is. This IMHO....is a 'socialist type' system that went terribly wrong....and I am certain that no one here will know how to fix it...unfortunately! sad.gif sad.gif

judy
IPB Image
Can anyone see the child?

What kind of chance does this little kid have with these parents? At least they are wearing helmets.
Arturo_Vandelay
QUOTE(judy @ Jan 27 2006, 05:20 PM) [snapback]179764[/snapback]

IPB Image
Can anyone see the child?




Is he carrying it to term?
davisął
Thanks Republicans.


Good, clean information

SOMETIMES AN INFORMED PUBLIC is the best weapon. Such has been the case with something called the Toxics Release Inventory, which exists because of a 20-year-old law that requires companies to report the amount of toxins they release into the air and water each year.

Since the law has been in effect, toxic emissions have fallen by at least 60%. Much of this reduction is the result of public pressure on businesses — public pressure that comes from public knowledge. One administrator from the Environmental Protection Agency has called the inventory one of the nation's most valuable environmental tools.


Yet because businesses have complained about the paperwork involved, the EPA now suggests weakening the requirements in two ways. One would allow smaller polluters to list only which chemicals they release, with no information on how much. The other would allow all companies to report their emissions every other year rather than annually.

Much information would be lost with weakened rules, with little economic gain. Paperwork is always a burden, but in this case industry has failed to show it is excessive. At any rate, the cost of gathering this information certainly doesn't outweigh the benefit of providing it to the public. The first rule change would seem to be negligible, because smaller polluters — those that release less than 500 pounds a year of poisonous substances — account for a tiny percentage of toxic emissions. But they tend to be located closer to residential areas, often poorer ones. And they often are owned by large corporations that can easily afford the tracking and paperwork.


Without knowing the amounts released, there's no way to track whether pollution is rising or falling. The same would be true with alternate-year reporting, which would give companies an incentive to increase emissions in non-reporting years and decrease them in years when the paperwork is required.

Bad public information is even more troubling than no public information. These EPA proposals would set the stage for both.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editor...ment-editorials
Bee
QUOTE(davisął @ Jan 28 2006, 09:17 AM) [snapback]179892[/snapback]

Thanks Republicans.
Good, clean information

SOMETIMES AN INFORMED PUBLIC is the best weapon. Such has been the case with something called the Toxics Release Inventory, which exists because of a 20-year-old law that requires companies to report the amount of toxins they release into the air and water each year.

Since the law has been in effect, toxic emissions have fallen by at least 60%. Much of this reduction is the result of public pressure on businesses — public pressure that comes from public knowledge. One administrator from the Environmental Protection Agency has called the inventory one of the nation's most valuable environmental tools.
Yet because businesses have complained about the paperwork involved, the EPA now suggests weakening the requirements in two ways. One would allow smaller polluters to list only which chemicals they release, with no information on how much. The other would allow all companies to report their emissions every other year rather than annually.

Much information would be lost with weakened rules, with little economic gain. Paperwork is always a burden, but in this case industry has failed to show it is excessive. At any rate, the cost of gathering this information certainly doesn't outweigh the benefit of providing it to the public. The first rule change would seem to be negligible, because smaller polluters — those that release less than 500 pounds a year of poisonous substances — account for a tiny percentage of toxic emissions. But they tend to be located closer to residential areas, often poorer ones. And they often are owned by large corporations that can easily afford the tracking and paperwork.


Without knowing the amounts released, there's no way to track whether pollution is rising or falling. The same would be true with alternate-year reporting, which would give companies an incentive to increase emissions in non-reporting years and decrease them in years when the paperwork is required.

Bad public information is even more troubling than no public information. These EPA proposals would set the stage for both.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editor...ment-editorials


Yep. Slimiest thing so far from the Republicans. Rather than going properly through Congress where changing the law would be discussed and debated, the Prez just Directs the Agencies to "change Regulations."

This is yet another example of how Bush disregards the intent of the Constitution.

He's a jerk.
lil bart
QUOTE(judy @ Jan 27 2006, 04:20 PM) [snapback]179764[/snapback]

IPB Image
Can anyone see the child?

What kind of chance does this little kid have with these parents? At least they are wearing helmets.


There was a picture on the front page of my local paper the other day of a I-kid-you-not two-year-old riding an electric motorcycle down a public street with no helmet. It was put out as a "isn't that cute" photo op.

Two year old.

Electric bike.

No helmet.

What-the-F.

judy
QUOTE(Arturo_Vandelay @ Jan 27 2006, 10:01 PM) [snapback]179806[/snapback]

Is he carrying it to term?

laugh.gif biggrin.gif laugh.gif
lil bart
Record breaking rains this year and pounding rains last night made it an appropriate morning to find a piece such as this.

QUOTE
Monday, January 30, 2006

Scientists fear unusual weather behind massive seabird die-off


By ROBERT McCLURE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

Alone in the nest, the starving seabird chick looked a little woozy. Then it collapsed.

Hours passed before the desperate mother bird returned, a fish tail sticking out of her beak. Again and again she offered the fresh morsel. But it was too late -- the baby bird was dying.

"It's an ugly, gut-wrenching thing to watch," said University of Washington researcher Julia Parrish, who witnessed such a scene repeatedly last summer, hidden amid the cacophony of 6,000 nesting murres on Tatoosh Island off the Olympic Peninsula.

IPB Image


The murres' unusual mass starvation became a clue in a mystery unfolding along the West Coast.

Weather, scientists know, is the key to the puzzle. For some reason, winds and currents crucial to the marine food web just didn't happen on schedule last year.

Seabird breeding failures in the summer were preceded by tens of thousands of birds washing up dead on beaches in Washington, Oregon and California.

And Washington's largest colony of glaucous-winged gulls also sputtered: Where 8,000 chicks normally fledge, 88 did last year.

"The whole process broke down," Parrish said. "We don't know what happened."

Earlier this month, 45 researchers met in Seattle to hash out the cause.

Though they couldn't trace the source of the weird weather, many are warily eyeing the coming spring, wondering: Was that just a blip, an anomaly -- or is this what global warming looks like?

Recall that at this time last year, Seattleites were cooing about a string of sunny winter days -- if they weren't complaining about the lack of powder on the slopes at Snoqualmie. It was warm and dry. It marked the third year of above-normal ocean temperatures.

Then rain started pouring in early spring. At a time when the birds should have been making and feeding babies, a network of beachcombing citizen-scientists run by Parrish instead found them dead.

"It was the birds that were the first harbingers of this whole problem," said Bill Peterson of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which set up the Seattle meeting.

The dramatic downturns among certain bird species didn't happen in a vacuum.

Researchers last year also recorded low catches of juvenile salmon and rockfish, and there were sightings of emaciated gray whales. Those findings were preceded by the first-time appearance in Washington of thousands of squid normally not found north of San Francisco. And a kind of plankton typically found near San Diego bloomed along Northwest beaches.

A scientist studying the longest-running set of indicators of Pacific Ocean conditions says we can expect this kind of thing to repeat as the planet warms and weather patterns are altered.

"There are all these unconnected reports of biological failures," said John McGowan of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif. "It's all the way up and down the coast. ... There's a lot of evidence there are important changes going on in the Pacific coast system."

'The smoking gun'

By the door to Parrish's office is a little sign: "I really need to stop depending on birds for important information. They're cute to look at but don't have much upstairs."

From her perch above a courtyard at UW's College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences in Seattle, Parrish directs the Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team. About 300 volunteers scour Oregon and Washington beaches for dead birds.

Based on monthly surveys, researchers estimated the dead birds numbered in the tens of thousands. Dominating the toll were the Brandt's cormorant and the common murre.

"They were clearly starving to death -- no fat, reduced musculature," Parrish said. "The smoking gun is no food."

Unlike migratory birds, they were stuck with what the Northwest coast had to offer. Unlike birds with wider-ranging diets, such as gulls, both rely almost exclusively on diving deep underwater for small schooling baitfish that also feed whales, seals, salmon and other animals.

At Tatoosh Island, it looked like the same story. The murres like fatty, nutritious sand lance, herring, surf smelt and eulachon -- the latter nicknamed "candlefish" because they're so full of oil that, when dried, they can be placed upright and lit to burn like a candle.

For a murre, eating those fish "is like popping little energy bars," Parrish said.

But last summer the murres brought back no sand lance and hardly any herring. Catches of the other two fish also were reduced. Instead Parrish's research team saw them toting fish like the Pacific saury, which they had almost never seen the birds eating in 14 years of watching them.

"The steak and chicken fell out of the diet," Parrish said. "It's like going to the grocery store and (seeing) there are only a few yucky things in the store. You adapt by using what's there."

The phenomenon was widespread. At Triangle Island in British Columbia and California's Farallon Islands, researchers saw a third seabird, the Cassin's auklet, show signs of starvation, said Bill Sydeman of the Point Reyes Bird Observatory.

The Farallon auklets started the breeding season late. Only half as many as normal even tried. Then they abandoned the nests.

"That's unprecedented in 35 years of studying Cassin's auklets on the Farallons" and unnoted in decades of anecdotal accounts before, Sydeman said.

In nearby waters, researchers found a 60 percent reduction from the last year in the birds' primary food, a tiny shrimplike crustacean called krill. Up in British Columbia, the birds eat a different form of plankton -- yet also had trouble raising young.

No one thinks a single year's breeding failure is a catastrophe for overall populations of the birds. They live many years.

But it was unusual and widespread enough to spark urgent questions.

"It's something having to do with food," Sydeman said. "We're all pretty sure."

Weather sparks meeting

Along the coast of Washington and Oregon, researchers think they know what happened: The wind didn't blow.

Usually in the spring, a weather maker called the Aleutian Low that throws winter storms our way moves north. Soon strong winds blow from north to south. Because the Earth is turning to the east, these winds push the surface of the Pacific to the southwest, leaving a little gap in the water near shore.

Water from deep in the ocean surges up to fill the gap. It's cold water, loaded with nutrients from dead plankton, dead fish, fish excrement and more.

"Basically, you can think of it as a lot of schmutz that settles to the bottom," Parrish said.

The cold water is fertilizer to the ocean garden. No cold water, no plankton. No plankton, no sand lance or other "forage fish" -- staples of many fish and birds.

Last year, though, the winds from the north didn't start in March or April as they normally do. Nary a wisp came until late May, and it didn't really get going good until mid-July.

The scientists' meeting in Seattle was organized to bring together oceanographers, atmospheric scientists, marine mammal experts, seabird biologists and researchers who model ecosystems and ocean circulation.

"The weather guys didn't really know what to say other than it was weird weather. That's not very satisfying," said Peterson, the oceanographer.

The term "global warming" oversimplifies a chain of coming changes -- some related to warming, some not, but happening simultaneously, scientists emphasize. Climate change is superimposed on natural cycles.

"We're all scientists. ... We want to know why, and if it could happen again," Peterson said.

Instead, they will write a series of scientific papers carefully documenting their observations.

A look at the past, said Scripps' McGowan, is telling: In the last 30 years, the top 300 feet of the Pacific warmed and became more dense.

Off Southern California, zooplankton are down 70 percent, fish larvae 50 percent, and there have been massive die-offs of kelp. McGowan's institution has studied ocean temperatures since 1919 and started a comprehensive Pacific monitoring project in 1949.

In Puget Sound, the number of seabirds dropped by nearly half since the 1970s. Nearly a third of seabird species are legally protected or candidates for protection.

"All kinds of things are changing, and the biology is responding in funny, non-linear, confusing ways," McGowan said. "Not everything has declined, but many things have."

Gulls abandon nests

The largest gathering of nesting seabirds in Washington happens every summer at Protection Island, between Sequim and Port Townsend off the northeast Olympic Peninsula. It's also the state's largest colony of glaucous-winged gulls.

There, researcher Joe Galusha of Walla Walla College has studied the gulls for 25 years. Last year the birds began gathering as usual. About 8,000 paired up, established nests and laid eggs -- just as always.

The gulls seemed to have no trouble gathering food -- unlike the murres at Tatoosh Island.

The gulls have a much less specialized diet than the murres, which may explain the difference, Parrish said.

Even so, most of the gulls later abandoned their nests.

Galusha thinks bald eagles may be to blame. When he started watching the gulls in 1980, the eagles' numbers were way down. Perhaps seven or eight harassed the 8,000 or so gulls by the early 1990s.

Their numbers grew gradually to the point that last summer, up to 38 different eagles menaced the gulls simultaneously.

Every time, the gulls had to take flight -- which burns energy. Most simply gave up.

In the end, 88 chicks were fledged where 8,000 to 10,000 normally are.

"We classify that as catastrophic reproductive failure," Galusha said.

Simple, right? Maybe not. Galusha and others still want to know why eagles are increasingly turning to Protection Island. Is their food supply also in flux?

"Next summer is key," Galusha said. "This may simply have been an aberration."

The Sea Doc Society, a University of California-Davis research arm, is about to fund a study by Parrish to investigate seabird diets in the Puget Sound region.

Nathan Mantua, a UW scientist studying the effects of climate change on the Northwest, said he will run climate simulations to see how often this kind of thing could have been expected in the past and how often we might expect it as man-made greenhouse gases alter the climate.

"We don't know if it's just a random thing or something we might expect to see more or less of in the future," Mantua said. "If you're thinking this is just an unlucky roll of the dice, how often will it happen again?"

WEIRD WEATHER

With ocean temperatures warming to unusually high levels over the last three years, scientists noted a string of unusual happenings affecting marine life from northern California to Alaska.

IPB Image

1. Triangle Island: Nesting success plummeted for the Cassin's auklet, a seabird, in 2005.
2. Lake Washington and Ship Canal: About half the 2004 run of sockeye salmon -- some 200,000 fish -- failed to materialize. Scientists suspect overly warm water was the cause.
3. Whidbey Island: A Humboldt squid, normally found in Mexico and southern California, turned up on the beach on Jan. 2.
4. Protection Island: Last summer, glaucous-winged gulls that normally fledge about 8,000 chicks produced only 88.
5. Tatoosh Island: Breeding started late for common murres last spring. Only about one-fifth fledged chicks, compared to up to four-fifths in a good year.
6. Northwest Coast: Tens of thousands of common murres and Brandt's cormorants -- emaciated at a time of year they should be flush -- turned up dead on Oregon and Washington beaches in spring 2005.
7. Southern Washington to Alaska Panhandle: Numerous sightings of Humbolt squid, which normally lives off Southern California and farther south, in summer 2004.
8. Northwest coast: Gray whales migrating from Mexico to the Bering Sea had so exhausted their fat reserves that their bodies were misshapen as they passed by last spring.
9. Northwest coast: Scientists trawling for young salmon found counts extremely low in spring and fall 2005.
10. Northern California: Scientists trawling for young rock- fish found counts very low in 2005.
11. Farallon Islands: Auklets that abandoned their nests in unprecedented numbers. Where hundreds of chicks normally are produced, only a handful were in 2005. Lack of food is blamed.
12. Monterey, Calif.: Large number of seabirds found dead on beaches in spring 2005.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/257515_deadbirds30.html
Spot
sad.gif I saw online that Phoenix just set a record for lack of rain. It isn't just the amount of rain, but the pattern is too far north this year. So the northwest gets a ton and the southwest gets little or none.


Thank God for pipes and canals.
lil bart
QUOTE(Spot @ Jan 30 2006, 12:56 PM) [snapback]180606[/snapback]

sad.gif I saw online that Phoenix just set a record for lack of rain. It isn't just the amount of rain, but the pattern is too far north this year. So the northwest gets a ton and the southwest gets little or none.
Thank God for pipes and canals.


I've been saying "weird weather" for a couple of years and it just keeps getting weirder. The ramifications noted in that article render the whole subject more serious than mere daily or seasonal observations.
Spot
It stands to reason that species come and go over this kind of weather patterns and changes. Humans didn't save up enough water to last a weekend in New Orleans, and we had warning and are supposed to be smarter than birds.

There's good reason that fossils tell the tale of things that no longer exist. Nature is cruel, it's just a fact.
lil bart
Well, like I said the other day, Spotty, I don't bother to argue this anymore. Mother Nature will make the case and we can react too little too late. It's become an issue for most people, from polls I have read, I suggest for cause.
Spot
When they found out recently how much methane plants put out I really began to question how much control humans have over anything. We can spend billions on pollution control for cars, then BOOM, one mount Pinatubo and nature has undone all our efforts.

http://www9.sbs.com.au/theworldnews/region...126799®ion=3

PLANTS METHANE SOURCE: EXPERTS
12.1.2006. 18:34:48

German scientists say they have discovered a new source of methane — a greenhouse gas that is second only to carbon dioxide in its impact on climate change.

The researchers said the culprits are plants which apparently produce about 10 to 30 percent of the annual methane found in the atmosphere.

Scientists measured the amount of methane released by plants and found it increases with rising temperatures and exposure to sunlight.

They say their finding is important in understanding the link between global warming and a rise in greenhouse gases.

At the same time, a study published in the British weekly science journal Nature claims that global warming has wiped out two-thirds of species of unique frogs that inhabit the cloud forests of Central America.

The study claims 67 percent of the 110 varieties of harlequin frog, along with the golden toad, have disappeared from tropical America in the past 20 years.

The authors point the finger at a fungus called Batrachochytrium
dendrobatidis that grows on the frog's skin and eventually slays the amphibian.

Outbreaks of the fungus are clearly linked to man-made global warming, said the authors, led by Alan Pounds of the Monteverde Cloud Forest Preserve in Costa Rica.

Of the world's 1,856 known amphibian species, 427 are listed as critically endangered, including 122 species that are possibly extinct.

Also a study published this week in the British journal Biology
Letters warns of the knock-on impact of climate shifts on whale populations.

British scientists looked at population numbers among southern right whales.

Their estimates, dating back 30 years, looked at individually identifiable whales spotted at their breeding grounds off the coast of Argentina in the Southwest Atlantic.

Breeding success was strongly linked with occurrences of El Nino, the disruptive buildup of warm water in the Western Pacific, which in turn had an impact on krill, the whales' staple food, in the Southern Ocean.
Bee
Weird weather all over.

I played tennis on Saturday.

It was a balmy 57 degrees.

In January.

In Connecticut.

This morning I saw gnats flying around.

In January.

In Connecticut.

Did I mention I live near a ski resort?

There's no snow anywhere.

But it's must be those dang plants. Man has no impact on the environment whatsoever.
Bix12
QUOTE(Bee @ Jan 30 2006, 08:59 PM) [snapback]180656[/snapback]

<snip> Man has no impact on the environment whatsoever.


Of course not...either directly or indirectly dry.gif if, however, something were to go amiss, we are more than willing to make amends....as the article below illustrates.

Regard:




QUOTE
Exxon Lax

Exxon posts record-breaking profit, tries to evade Exxon Valdez penalty

ExxonMobil has announced that it reaped $36 billion in profits for 2005 -- the largest single-year profit ever by any American corporation. In related news, last week Exxon lawyers asked a federal court to effectively waive $5 billion in punitive damages related to the massive 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, meant to compensate thousands of Alaskans who lost their livelihoods. The company, which has been tenaciously resisting the fines since the day of the spill, argued that it had already done enough by spending $3 billion on cleanups and settling other lawsuits. Some in the packed courtroom openly laughed as an Exxon lawyer argued that "harm was largely avoided" by what the company's paid so far. Yup, that's funny all right. Ha. Ha.


Exxon urges court to reduce $5 billion Valdez award
By DAVID KRAVETS

The Associated Press

Exxon is appealing an award to 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans whose property and jobs were harmed by oil on roughly 1,500 miles of coastline.


SAN FRANCISCO — ExxonMobil urged a federal appeals court Friday to erase the $5 billion in damages an Alaska jury ordered the oil giant to pay for the 1989 Valdez oil spill.

Exxon attorney Walter Dellinger told a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the company should be liable for no more than $25 million in punitive damages. Punitive damages are meant to deter and punish misconduct.

Exxon, which reported third-quarter earnings of $10 billion, said it has spent more than $3 billion on cleanup work and to settle other federal and state lawsuits stemming from the spill.

"Deterrence has been so satisfied by that amount," Dellinger said, adding that because of the money Exxon already has paid out over the last 16 years "the harm was largely avoided."

The comment prompted chuckles from a packed courtroom that included fishermen whose livelihoods were damaged when the Valdez hit a charted reef and dumped 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound.

"Our lives were trashed," said Max McCarty, a former Prince William Sound fisherman who said he now works as a substitute teacher in Arizona and hawks fish at local markets.

Friday's arguments were based on Exxon's appeal of an Anchorage jury's 1994 punitive damages award to 34,000 fishermen and other Alaskans whose property and jobs were harmed by the black goo the ship left smeared on roughly 1,500 miles of coastline.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/loca...3_exxon28e.html

Bee
Aawwwww

Exxon is crying poverty? laugh.gif

I bet those Alaskans were chuckling. The arrogance and hubris of Big Oil is rather comical in it's recent manifestations.

No one told them to spend billions on appeals. They'd be better off just paying what they owe--through their own negligence--to the people who'w lives they destroyed.
Bix12
QUOTE(Bee @ Feb 1 2006, 07:36 AM) [snapback]180914[/snapback]

Aawwwww

Exxon is crying poverty? laugh.gif

I bet those Alaskans were chuckling. The arrogance and hubris of Big Oil is rather comical in it's recent manifestations.

No one told them to spend billions on appeals. They'd be better off just paying what they owe--through their own negligence--to the people who'w lives they destroyed.


How about a sense of duty...to do what's right and honorable?

Rather than trying to screw people....how about setting an example for the other mega-corporations?

unsure.gif

Well...that's just insanity...what is wrong with me?
Bee
QUOTE(Bix12 @ Feb 1 2006, 07:45 AM) [snapback]180916[/snapback]

How about a sense of duty...to do what's right and honorable?

Rather than trying to screw people....how about setting an example for the other mega-corporations?

unsure.gif

Well...that's just insanity...what is wrong with me?


Fargin optimist. cool.gif
Bix12
QUOTE
Well, They Had to Chop Something

BLM suspends funding for forestry research that contradicts Bush policy

The Bureau of Land Management has abruptly suspended funding for a team of scientists who published findings undercutting a Bush administration timber policy. The Oregon State University researchers' report, published last month in the journal Science, suggested that forests scorched in southwest Oregon's 2002 Biscuit fire recovered more quickly if left alone to regenerate, rather than being logged and replanted. OSU administration says it has no doubts about the integrity of the research. The funding suspension is "totally without precedent as far as I can recollect," said University of Washington forest researcher Jerry Franklin. "It says, 'If we don't like what you're saying, we'll cut off your money.'" However, federal officials deny the action was political retaliation, saying the researchers violated some terms of the funding agreement. dry.gif For instance, part B, subsection E4, where it says "don't effing cross us, punks."

Imagine that...Mr. Compassionate Conservative & his integrity challenged administration cutting the funding to anyone just because they don't agree with the White House's official POV.... dry.gif

QUOTE
BLM freezes OSU's grant behind study

Forestry - The suspension adds a new element to the furor over salvage logging
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
MICHAEL MILSTEIN

The federal government has abruptly suspended funding for Oregon State University research that concluded federally sponsored logging after the 2002 Biscuit fire in southwest Oregon set back the recovery of forests.

The action came after a team of scientists from OSU and the U.S. Forest Service published their results last month in Science, the nation's leading scientific journal.

It escalated the controversy surrounding the findings, which undercut Bush administration-backed arguments for logging after wildfires. The research, led by a 29-year-old graduate student, already had come under attack within OSU's College of Forestry by professors who contend that logging and replanting speed recovery of burned forests.

Those professors tried but failed to persuade Science not to publish the one-page report.

Administrators at OSU and scientists elsewhere said they could not recall another instance of the federal government suspending funding for research after controversial results emerge.

"It's totally without precedent as far as I can recollect," said Jerry Franklin, a professor at the University of Washington who has studied Northwest forests for decades. "It says, 'If we don't like what you're saying, we'll cut off your money.' "

<snip>

Andy Stahl, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, said the suspension of funding was a "shot across the bows" to researchers who produce findings the government does not like.

"Either way, the administration, regardless of the outcome of this incident, has made its message clear," he said. "You knuckle under and give us the results we want, or we won't fund you."


http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/i...2730.xml&coll=7


Thugs, pure & simple...it's a new form of extortion. mad.gif
davisął
It's called retaliation.
Bix12
QUOTE
Paradise Found

Researchers discover treasure trove of new tropical species in Indonesia

Just when we thought we'd colonized it all: Scientists have discovered a jungle in New Guinea's Foja mountains that is home to hundreds of rare and dozens of previously unknown species of flora and fauna. Researchers were helicoptered into the Rhode Island-sized area and spent a month in a state of awe. Among their findings were a new species of honeyeater bird, a nearly extinct tree kangaroo, a rhododendron with blossoms the size of bread plates, and an aptly named bird of paradise that hadn't been recorded since the 19th century. "It is as close to the Garden of Eden as you're going to find on earth," said chief scientist Bruce Beehler of Conservation International, who also noted that the animals in the tropical utopia were not afraid of humans.


Wow! That's pretty freakin' awesome! Let's hope they put it under extremely restrictive protection right away...


QUOTE
Scientists hail discovery of hundreds of new species in remote New Guinea
By Terry Kirby, Chief Reporter
Published: 07 February 2006

An astonishing mist-shrouded "lost world" of previously unknown and rare animals and plants high in the mountain rainforests of New Guinea has been uncovered by an international team of scientists.

Among the new species of birds, frogs, butterflies and palms discovered in the expedition through this pristine environment, untouched by man, was the spectacular Berlepsch's six-wired bird of paradise. The scientists are the first outsiders to see it. They could only reach the remote mountainous area by helicopter, which they described it as akin to finding a "Garden of Eden".

In a jungle camp site, surrounded by giant flowers and unknown plants, the researchers watched rare bowerbirds perform elaborate courtship rituals. The surrounding forest was full of strange mammals, such as tree kangaroos and spiny anteaters, which appeared totally unafraid, suggesting no previous contact with humans.

Bruce Beehler, of the American group Conservation International, who led the month-long expedition last November and December, said: "It is as close to the Garden of Eden as you're going to find on Earth. We found dozens, if not hundreds, of new species in what is probably the most pristine ecosystem in the whole Asian-Pacific region. There were so many new things it was almost overwhelming. And we have only scratched the surface of what is there." The scientists hope to return this year.

<snip>

The first discovery made by the team, within hours of arrival, was of a bizarre, red-faced, wattled honeyeater that proved to be the first new species of bird discovered in New Guinea - which has a higher number of bird species for its size than anywhere else in the world - since 1939. The scientists also found the rare golden-fronted bowerbird, first identified from skins in 1825. Although Professor Diamond located their homeland in 1981, the expedition was able to photograph the bird in its metre-high "maypole" dance grounds, which the birds construct to attract mates. Male bowerbirds, believed to be the most highly evolved of all birds, build large and extravagant nests to attract females.

The most remarkable find was of a creature called Berlepsch's six-wired bird of paradise, named after the six spines on the top of its head, and thought "lost" to science. It had been previously identified only from the feathers of dead birds.

<snip>

Scientists also found more than 20 new species of frogs, four new butterflies, five new species of palm and many other plants yet to be classified, including what may be the world's largest rhododendron flower. Botanists on the team said many plants were completely unlike anything they had encountered before.

<snip>

"This is a place with no roads or trails and never, so far as we know, visited by man ... This proves there are still places to be discovered that man has not touched."...(more below)


http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article343740.ece


Amazing...absolutely incredible...
davisął
Where are the culture of life people when it comes to this issue? They are siding with the energy corporations because they have mutual political allies.

Mercury test shows area women at risk

February 9, 2006

BY LORI RACKL Health Reporter

One in five women of childbearing age has unsafe levels of mercury, according to a large study that measured the neurotoxin in hair samples taken from thousands of people nationwide.

The numbers proved even more dramatic in Chicago, where one in four of the tested females between the ages of 16 and 49 had mercury levels exceeding federal health limits.

"This is a serious public health problem," said Jack Darin, director of the Illinois Chapter of the Sierra Club, which helped recruit volunteers whose hair was tested for mercury by a University of North Carolina lab. "The bad news is women in the Chicago area have to be concerned that what should be a healthy food could be hurting them. The good news is it's a problem we can solve."

MERCURY IN FISH

Consumers can reduce the risk associated with eating fish contaminated with mercury by choosing fish lower in mercury. Here are those that are highest and lowest in mercury, according to federal government test results:

HIGHEST
# Grouper
# King mackerel
# Shark
# Swordfish
# Tilefish (Gulf of Mexico)
LOWEST
# Catfish
# Cod
# Haddock
# Ocean perch
# Salmon
# Shellfish (most)
# Tilapia
# Trout
# Whitefish

SOURCE: Sierra Club, Food and Drug Administration

The Sierra Club and other environmental groups have been pushing to drastically reduce mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants -- something Gov. Blagojevich proposed earlier this year. Mercury released from these plants, among other sources, settles into waterways, contaminating fish and the people who eat them.

Coal plant operators dispute the need for and feasibility of Blagojevich's plan, and there's a debate in the health world about what constitutes safe mercury levels in humans.

Womb exposure can damage baby

The Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration say high levels of mercury are of particular concern for women in their childbearing years because exposure in the womb can cause neurological damage and other health problems to fetuses. Previous research by an EPA mercury expert determined that one in six newborns in this country could be at risk.

Mercury also can be dangerous to young children, whose brains and organs are still developing. The federal government has not set mercury health standards for older children, men, or women who are at least 50 years old.

Heather Braglia of Elmwood Park was among the nearly 6,600 people of all ages who volunteered to have a snippet of their hair tested for mercury. Braglia said her results fell just shy of the federal safety limit -- close enough to make her forgo more of the sushi and other fish that had been a staple in her diet.

Participant will cut back

"I want to start a family soon," said Braglia, 26. "So I've cut down a lot. I used to eat fish three or four times a week. Now I probably eat it two or three times a month."

Steve Patch, co-author of the new mercury report and director of the lab that did the hair analysis, said that, "the greatest single factor influencing mercury exposure was the frequency of fish consumption."

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-merc09.html
Tom Servo
QUOTE(Bix12 @ Feb 8 2006, 02:35 AM) [snapback]182836[/snapback]

Imagine that...Mr. Compassionate Conservative & his integrity challenged administration cutting the funding to anyone just because they don't agree with the White House's official POV.... dry.gif
A shame more of them don't disagree with him. America could get that smaller gubmint the repubs keep prattling about every election cycle, out of nothing more than spite! laugh.gif
Chris

Major Firms Endorse Climate Plan
Stephen Leahy

BROOKLIN, Canada, Feb 10 (IPS) - Several leading energy and manufacturing firms have joined with a prominent environmental think tank to develop the United States' first comprehensive plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Shell Oil, British Petroleum, Cinergy Corp., Intel, the aluminium producer Alcan Inc., and others have endorsed the "Agenda for Climate Action" issued by the Virginia-based Pew Centre on Climate Change, a non-governmental group that works with the private sector to provide reliable information and solutions on climate change.

The report, released Wednesday, is the first broad consensus of the policies needed for the U.S. to successfully address the environmental problems caused by the burning of fossil fuels like oil and coal, says Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Centre.

It coincided with a widely-publicised call by 85 influential U.S. evangelical Christian leaders for Congress to pass legislation that would reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.

"Some believe the answer to addressing climate change lies in technology incentives. Others say limiting emissions is the only answer. We need both," said Claussen in a statement.

The U.S. is responsible for 25 percent of the world's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), but the George W. Bush administration pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol to address climate change in 2001. The treaty, which runs until 2012 and has been ratified by more than 150 countries, commits participating developed nations to cut their emissions to an average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels.

The administration's refusal to consider mandatory GHG reductions has placed it at odds with environmental groups, many state and local governments, and even a number of large corporations concerned that the current reliance on fossil fuels is unsustainable in the long term.

The Pew report notes that concentrations of GHG are the highest they have been in hundreds of thousands of years, causing "observable impacts throughout the world, and these changes are happening more quickly than expected".

"I am convinced that it is prudent to take action now to address what we do know (about climate change)," said James Rogers, the CEO of Cinergy, in a statement. Cinergy, a Cincinnati-based energy utility, is the fifth largest U.S. producer of electricity from coal.

The report calls for a combination of economy-wide mandatory emissions cuts, technology development, scientific research, alternative energy production, and adaptation. It makes 15 specific recommendations that can be implemented right away, including U.S.. domestic reductions and engagement in the international negotiation process.

"The report represents a pragmatic and meaningful action plan to reduce emissions," said Vicki Arroyo, the director of policy analysis at the Pew Centre.

Constructive participation by the U.S. at the international level to strengthen global efforts to reduce emissions is an important part of this plan, Arroyo told IPS. "The George W. Bush administration's voluntary reduction plan is clearly not working, and that's not going to change without policy and regulation," she said.

The head of Shell Oil Company agrees. "The changes needed in our energy infrastructure to meet future demand and respond to climate change will not happen by chance," said John Hofmeister, its president and U.S. chair.

"A clear, long-term framework will give business the necessary incentive and confidence to invest further," Hofmeister said in a statement.

The report gives special attention to transportation and energy use because they are the two major sources of U.S. emissions, Arroyo noted. The transportation sector alone accounts for 30 percent of all U.S. emissions, and attempts to improve vehicle fuel efficiency over the past few years have failed due to intense lobbying from carmakers and some oil companies, and opposition by the Bush administration.

U.S. vehicle fuel efficiency standards under the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) programme have changed little since 1985. And recent research by Consumer Reports calculated that the actual miles per gallon of 2003 U.S. vehicle fleets were overstated by more than 30 percent.

To get around the miles-per-gallon political logjam, the report recommends setting a tradeable GHG-emissions-per-mile standard for a car manufacturer's fleet of vehicles, Arroyo said.

Although similar to the current CAFE programme, the key difference is that a company whose average is below the standard could earn "credits" that could be banked for future years or sold to other car manufacturers or on the growing carbon credit marketplace.

"It gets at the climate change problem and offers away around the CAFE programme impasse," she said.

Major government incentives are also needed to bring zero or low-emission vehicles to market, along with increased spending on research into biofuels.

"Improving energy efficiency is the easiest thing that we could do and companies tell us cost savings usually result from those improvements," Arroyo said.

However, more efficient energy use and production will not be nearly enough to achieve the needed emissions reductions in an economy where per capita energy use is climbing ever upward as people acquire more and more electronic gadgets. U.S. emissions have grown by more than 18 percent since 1990, and the Department of Energy projects that they will increase by another 37 percent by 2030.

Coal is by far the most GHG-intensive form of energy, and because it is cheap, it will continue to be a major source of U.S. energy. Massive investments in researching ways to capture and store GHG from coal power plants are needed, the report says.

"We're going to need all forms of energy production, including more coal and nuclear," Arroyo noted. "Despite the Bush administration's support for clean coal technologies, the U.S. is not investing anywhere near what will be needed to make this work."

Companies are currently building new coal plants, so there is tremendous urgency to develop these new technologies, she said. In addition, a safety and regulatory regime needs to be set up.

"These are all vital as the utility industry prepares to build the next generation of power plants needed by our growing economy," said Cinergy's Rogers.

Indeed, the report expresses the need for urgent action throughout. The much-needed transition to a low-emission economy "will not be easy but it is crucial to begin now. Further delay will only make the challenge before us more daunting and costly," it concludes. (END/2006) http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=32116
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.